Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessment
Dingquan Li, Tingting Jiang, Ming Jiang
Abstract
Currently, most image quality assessment (IQA) models are supervised by the MAE or MSE loss with empirically slow convergence. It is well-known that normalization can facilitate fast convergence. Therefore, we explore normalization in the design of loss functions for IQA. Specifically, we first normalize the predicted quality scores and the corresponding subjective quality scores. Then, the loss is defined based on the norm of the differences between these normalized values. The resulting "Norm-in-Norm" loss encourages the IQA model to make linear predictions with respect to subjective quality scores. After training, the least squares regression is applied to determine the linear mapping from the predicted quality to the subjective quality. It is shown that the new loss is closely connected with two common IQA performance criteria (PLCC and RMSE). Through theoretical analysis, it is proved that the embedded normalization makes the gradients of the loss function more stable and more predictable, which is conducive to the faster convergence of the IQA model. Furthermore, to experimentally verify the effectiveness of the proposed loss, it is applied to solve a challenging problem: quality assessment of in-the-wild images. Experiments on two relevant datasets (KonIQ-10k and CLIVE) show that, compared to MAE or MSE loss, the new loss enables the IQA model to converge about 10 times faster and the final model achieves better performance. The proposed model also achieves state-of-the-art prediction performance on this challenging problem. For reproducible scientific research, our code is publicly available at ://github.com/lidq92/LinearityIQA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3f9b5010-c152-478f-8022-8f2838da460aCited by top-tier papers13
- Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical PerspectivesHaoning Wu, Erli Zhang, Liang Liao, Chaofeng Chen et al.ICCV 2023 · 371 citations
- Content-Variant Reference Image Quality Assessment via Knowledge DistillationGuanghao Yin, Wei Wang, Zehuan Yuan, Chuchu Han et al.AAAI 2022 · 50 citations
- Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial AttacksAnastasia Antsiferova, Khaled Abud, Aleksandr Gushchin, Ekaterina Shumitskaya et al.AAAI 2024 · 21 citations
- Defense Against Adversarial Attacks on No-Reference Image Quality Models with Gradient Norm RegularizationYujia Liu, Chenxi Yang, Dingquan Li, Jianhao Ding et al.CVPR 2024 · 15 citations
- No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Dynamic Complex-Valued Neural ModelZihan Zhou, Yong Xu, Ruotao Xu, Yuhui QuanACM MM 2022 · 7 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Dual-Criterion Quality Loss for Blind Image Quality AssessmentDesen Yuan, Lei WangACM MM 2024 · 4 citations
- Re-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the WildAvinab Saha, Sandeep Mishra, Alan C. BovikCVPR 2023
- Beyond Cosine Similarity: Magnitude-Aware CLIP for No-Reference Image Quality AssessmentZhicheng Liao, Dongxu Wu, Zhenshan Shi, Sijie Mai et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- Learning Where to Look and How to Judge: Resolution-agnostic Image Quality Assessment with Quality-aware SaliencyHakan Emre Gedik, Shashank Gupta, Alan BovikCVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Regress Accurate Image Quality Scores Using Score DistributionZhiyuan You, Xin Cai, Jinjin Gu, Tianfan Xue et al.CVPR 2025
