Investigating Spatial Representation of Learning Content in Virtual Reality Learning Environments
Manshul Belani, Harsh Vardhan Singh, Aman Parnami, Pushpendra Singh
Abstract
A recent surge in the application of Virtual Reality in education has made VR Learning Environments (VRLEs) prevalent in fields ranging from aviation, medicine, and skill training to teaching factual and conceptual content. In spite of multiple 3D affordances provided by VR, learning content placement in VRLEs has been mostly limited to a static placement in the environment. We conduct two studies to investigate the effect of different spatial representations of learning content in virtual environments on learning outcomes and user experience. In the first study, we studied the effects of placing content at four different places - world-anchored (TV screen placed in the environment), user-anchored (panel anchored to the wrist or head-mounted display of the user) and object-anchored (panel anchored to the object associated with current content) - in the VR environment with forty-two participants in the context of learning how to operate a laser cutting machine through an immersive tutorial. In the follow-up study, twenty-two participants from this study were given the option to choose from these four placements to understand their preferences. The effects of placements were examined on learning outcome measures - knowledge gain, knowledge transfer, cognitive load, user experience, and user preferences. We found that participants preferred user-anchored (controller condition) and object-anchored placement. While knowledge gain, knowledge transfer, and cognitive load were not found to be significantly different between the four conditions, the object-anchored placement scored significantly better than the TV screen and head-mounted display conditions on the user experience scales of attractiveness, stimulation, and novelty.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 764fa259-c10e-445c-954f-33e97bd71c29Cited by top-tier papers2
- How Do We Evaluate Experiences in Immersive Environments?Xiang Li, Wei He, Per Ola KristenssonCHI 2026 · 4 citations
- An Evaluation of Spatial Anchoring to position AR Guidance in Arthroscopic SurgeryChaymae Acherki, Laurence Nigay, Quentin Roy, Thibault SalqueCHI 2025 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Effects of Device Environment and Information Layout on Spatial Memory and Performance in VR Selection TasksKim Kargut, Carl Gutwin, Andy CockburnCHI 2024 · 7 citations
- Telling Us What You Experience: Effects of Questionnaire Interface Design on Subjective Measurements in Virtual RealityLucas Küntzer, Martin Feick, Max Benzschawel, Naz Al Kassm et al.IEEE VR 2026 · 1 citation
- Effects of Virtual Hand Representation on Interaction and Embodiment in HMD-based Virtual Environments Using ControllersChristos Lougiakis, Akrivi Katifori, Maria Roussou, Ioannis Panagiotis IoannidisIEEE VR 2020 · 12 citations
- Beyond Slideshows - Investigating the Impact of Immersive Virtual Reality on Science LearningFabian Fröhlich, Chris Hovey, Sameen Reza, Jan L. PlassIEEE VR 2024 · 9 citations
- The influence of hand visualization in tool-based motor-skills training, a longitudinal studyAylen Ricca, Amine Chellali, Samir OtmaneIEEE VR 2021 · 33 citations
