Predictive Preference Learning from Human Interventions
Haoyuan Cai, Zhenghao Mark Peng, Bolei Zhou
Abstract
Learning from human involvement aims to incorporate the human subject to monitor and correct agent behavior errors. Although most interactive imitation learning methods focus on correcting the agent's action at the current state, they do not adjust its actions in future states, which may be potentially more hazardous. To address this, we introduce Predictive Preference Learning from Human Interventions (PPL), which leverages the implicit preference signals contained in human interventions to inform predictions of future rollouts. The key idea of PPL is to bootstrap each human intervention into L future time steps, called the preference horizon, with the assumption that the agent follows the same action and the human makes the same intervention in the preference horizon. By applying preference optimization on these future states, expert corrections are propagated into the safety-critical regions where the agent is expected to explore, significantly improving learning efficiency and reducing human demonstrations needed. We evaluate our approach with experiments on both autonomous driving and robotic manipulation benchmarks and demonstrate its efficiency and generality. Our theoretical analysis further shows that selecting an appropriate preference horizon L balances coverage of risky states with label correctness, thereby bounding the algorithmic optimality gap. Demo and code are available at: https://metadriverse.github.io/ppl.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7616f020-eba7-4b68-8749-68d9969a79f7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine TranslationHaoran Xu, Amr Sharaf, Yunmo Chen, Weiting Tan et al.ICML 2024 · 447 citations
- Learning to summarize with human feedbackNisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel M. Ziegler et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 124 citations
Related papers
- Limited Preference Aided Imitation Learning from Imperfect DemonstrationsXingchen Cao, Fan-Ming Luo, Junyin Ye, Tian Xu et al.ICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?Taehyun Cho, Seokhun Ju, Seungyub Han, Dohyeong Kim et al.ICML 2025
- Reinforcement Learning from Imperfect Corrective Actions and Proxy RewardsZhaohui Jiang, Xuening Feng, Paul Weng, Yifei Zhu et al.ICLR 2025
- Robot-Gated Interactive Imitation Learning with Adaptive Intervention MechanismHaoyuan Cai, Zhenghao Peng, Bolei ZhouICML 2025
- Faithful Dynamic Imitation Learning from Human Intervention with Dynamic Regret MinimizationBo Ling, Zhengyu Gan, Wanyuan Wang, Guanyu Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025
