Off-policy Evaluation Beyond Overlap: Sharp Partial Identification Under Smoothness
Samir Khan, Martin Saveski, Johan Ugander
Abstract
Off-policy evaluation, and the complementary problem of policy learning, use historical data collected under a logging policy to estimate and/or optimize the value of a target policy. Methods for these tasks typically assume overlap between the target and logging policy, enabling solutions based on importance weighting and/or imputation. Absent such an overlap assumption, existing work either relies on a well-specified model or optimizes needlessly conservative bounds. In this work, we develop methods for no-overlap policy evaluation without a well-specified model, relying instead on non-parametric assumptions on the expected outcome, with a particular focus on Lipschitz smoothness. Under such assumptions we are able to provide sharp bounds on the offpolicy value, along with asymptotically optimal estimators of those bounds. For Lipschitz smoothness, we construct a pair of linear programs that upper and lower bound the contribution of the nooverlap region to the off-policy value. We show that these programs have a concise closed form solution, and that their solutions converge under the Lipschitz assumption to the sharp partial identification bounds at a minimax optimal rate, up to log factors. We demonstrate the effectiveness our methods on two semi-synthetic examples, and obtain informative and valid bounds that are tighter than those possible without smoothness assumptions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 75f9fc0b-55e9-4c2e-b953-316751ec6b33Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Ching-An Cheng, Nan Jiang, Paul Mineiro et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 339 citations
- Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkageYi Su, Maria Dimakopoulou, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Miroslav DudíkICML 2020 · 128 citations
- Minimax Value Interval for Off-Policy Evaluation and Policy OptimizationNan Jiang, Jiawei HuangNeurIPS 2020 · 68 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual BanditsRuohan Zhan, Vitor Hadad, David A. Hirshberg, Susan AtheyKDD 2021 · 22 citations
- Off-policy Bandits with Deficient SupportNoveen Sachdeva, Yi Su, Thorsten JoachimsKDD 2020 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Multiply Robust Off-policy Evaluation and Learning under Truncation by DeathJianing Chu, Shu Yang, Wenbin LuICML 2023 · 6 citations
- Off-Policy Interval Estimation with Lipschitz Value IterationZiyang Tang, Yihao Feng, Na Zhang, Jian Peng et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 6 citations
- Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Confounded POMDPsMao Hong, Zhengling Qi, Yanxun XuICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Confounding-Robust Policy Evaluation in Infinite-Horizon Reinforcement LearningNathan Kallus, Angela ZhouNeurIPS 2020 · 78 citations
- Non-Asymptotic Analysis for Two Time-scale TDC with General Smooth Function ApproximationYue Wang, Shaofeng Zou, Yi ZhouNeurIPS 2021 · 12 citations
