From Text to Self: Users' Perception of AIMC Tools on Interpersonal Communication and Self
Yue Fu, Sami Foell, Xuhai Xu, Alexis Hiniker
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of AI-mediated communication (AIMC), tools powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming integral to interpersonal communication. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a one-week diary and interview study to explore users' perceptions of these tools' ability to: 1) support interpersonal communication in the short-term, and 2) lead to potential long-term eects. Our ndings indicate that participants view AIMC support favorably, citing benets such as increased communication condence, nding precise language to express their thoughts, and navigating linguistic and cultural barriers. However, our ndings also show current limitations of AIMC tools, including verbosity, unnatural responses, and excessive emotional intensity. These shortcomings are further exacerbated by user concerns about inauthenticity and potential overreliance on the technology. We identify four key communication spaces delineated by communication stakes (high or low) and relationship dynamics (formal or informal) that dierentially predict users' attitudes toward AIMC tools. Specically, participants report that these tools are more suitable for communicating in formal relationships than informal ones and more benecial in high-stakes than low-stakes communication.
• Human-centered computing ! Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 75f4fdd2-d8d2-46eb-a813-597598e80e66Cited by top-tier papers25
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About ItNanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra SelvanCHI 2025 · 33 citations
- Exploring Collaboration Patterns and Strategies in Human-AI Co-creation through the Lens of Agency: A Scoping Review of the Top-tier HCI LiteratureShuning Zhang, Hui Wang, Xin YiCSCW 2025 · 31 citations
- To Rely or Not to Rely? Evaluating Interventions for Appropriate Reliance on Large Language ModelsJessica Y. Bo, Sophia Wan, Ashton AndersonCHI 2025 · 31 citations
- Generative AI and Perceptual Harms: Who's Suspected of using LLMs?Kowe Kadoma, Danaë Metaxa, Mor NaamanCHI 2025 · 28 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Cracking the Case Together: Role Perceptions in Human-AI Mystery Solving DialoguesKarin Breckner, Johannes Schönböck, Carrie Kovacs, Frederik Hirschmann et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- A Conditional Companion: Lived Experiences of People with Mental Health Disorders Using LLMs: Conditional Companion: LLMs & Mental HealthAditya Kumar Purohit, Hendrik HeuerCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Expecting Too Much, Getting Too Little: Exploring the Challenges and Design Opportunities of Asynchronous AI InterviewersMd Nazmus Sakib, Naga Manogna Rayasam, Sanorita DeyCSCW 2026
- Towards Human-AI Deliberation: Design and Evaluation of LLM-Empowered Deliberative AI for AI-Assisted Decision-MakingShuai Ma, Qiaoyi Chen, Xinru Wang, Chengbo Zheng et al.CHI 2025 · 113 citations
- More than Decision Support: Exploring Patients' Longitudinal Usage of Large Language Models in Real-World Healthcare-Seeking JourneysYancheng Cao, Yishu Ji, Chris Yue Fu, Sahiti Dharmavaram et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
