WikiWhy: Answering and Explaining Cause-and-Effect Questions
Matthew Ho, Aditya Sharma, Justin Chang, Michael Saxon, Sharon Levy, Yujie Lu, William Yang Wang
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) grow larger and more sophisticated, assessing their "reasoning" capabilities in natural language grows more challenging. Recent question answering (QA) benchmarks that attempt to assess reasoning are often limited by a narrow scope of covered situations and subject matters. We introduce WikiWhy, a QA dataset built around a novel auxiliary task: explaining why an answer is true in natural language. WikiWhy contains over 9,000 "why" question-answer-rationale triples, grounded on Wikipedia facts across a diverse set of topics. Each rationale is a set of supporting statements connecting the question to the answer. WikiWhy serves as a benchmark for the reasoning capabilities of LLMs because it demands rigorous explicit rationales for each answer to demonstrate the acquisition of implicit commonsense knowledge, which is unlikely to be easily memorized. GPT-3 baselines achieve only 38.7% human-evaluated correctness in the end-to-end answer & explain condition, leaving significant room for future improvements.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 75c39ed8-6fcd-4067-8b25-2b470a191e26Cited by top-tier papers8
- CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language ModelsZhijing Jin, Yuen Chen, Felix Leeb, Luigi Gresele et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 74 citations
- Instruction Pre-Training: Language Models are Supervised Multitask LearnersDaixuan Cheng, Yuxian Gu, Shaohan Huang, Junyu Bi et al.EMNLP 2024 · 13 citations
- COLD: Causal reasOning in cLosed Daily activitiesAbhinav Joshi, Areeb Ahmad, Ashutosh ModiNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- CRT-QA: A Dataset of Complex Reasoning Question Answering over Tabular DataZhehao Zhang, Xitao Li, Yan Gao, Jian-Guang LouEMNLP 2023 · 3 citations
- METER: Evaluating Multi-Level Contextual Causal Reasoning in Large Language ModelsPengfeng Li, Chen Huang, Chaoqun Hao, Hongyao Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- Big Bird: Transformers for Longer SequencesManzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,159 citations
Related papers
- Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-ThoughtAbulhair Saparov, He HeICLR 2023 · 38 citations
- STREET: A Multi-Task Structured Reasoning and Explanation BenchmarkDanilo Neves Ribeiro, Shen Wang, Xiaofei Ma, Henghui Zhu et al.ICLR 2023 · 6 citations
- Meaningful Learning: Enhancing Abstract Reasoning in Large Language Models via Generic Fact GuidanceKai Xiong, Xiao Ding, Ting Liu, Bing Qin et al.NeurIPS 2024
- PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval EvaluationAlbert Gong, Kamile Stankeviciute, Chao Wan, Anmol Kabra et al.ICML 2025
- MMQA: Evaluating LLMs with Multi-Table Multi-Hop Complex QuestionsJian Wu, Linyi Yang, Dongyuan Li, Yuliang Ji et al.ICLR 2025
