Meaningful Learning: Enhancing Abstract Reasoning in Large Language Models via Generic Fact Guidance
Kai Xiong, Xiao Ding, Ting Liu, Bing Qin, Dongliang Xu, Qing Yang, Hongtao Liu, Yixin Cao
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have developed impressive performance and strong explainability across various reasoning scenarios, marking a significant stride towards mimicking human-like intelligence. Despite this, when tasked with several simple questions supported by a generic fact, LLMs often struggle to abstract and apply the generic fact to provide consistent and precise answers, revealing a deficiency in abstract reasoning abilities. This has sparked a vigorous debate about whether LLMs are genuinely reasoning or merely memorizing. In light of this, we design a preliminary study to quantify and delve into the abstract reasoning abilities of existing LLMs. Our findings reveal a substantial discrepancy between their general reasoning and abstract reasoning performances. To relieve this problem, we tailor an abstract reasoning dataset (AbsR) together with a meaningful learning paradigm to teach LLMs how to leverage generic facts for reasoning purposes. The results show that our approach not only boosts the general reasoning performance of LLMs but also makes considerable strides towards their capacity for abstract reasoning, moving beyond simple memorization or imitation to a more nuanced understanding and application of generic facts. The code is available at https://github.com/Waste-Wood/MeanLearn.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 229f550d-108c-411c-963e-bb015ea584b0Cited by top-tier papers3
- Matching Markets Meet LLMs: Algorithmic Reasoning with Ranked PreferencesHadi Hosseini, Samarth Khanna, Ronak SinghNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Reasoning Through Execution: Unifying Process and Outcome Rewards for Code GenerationZhuohao Yu, Weizheng Gu, Yidong Wang, Xingru Jiang et al.ICML 2025
- Benchmarking Abstract and Reasoning Abilities Through A Theoretical PerspectiveQingchuan Ma, Yuhang Wu, Xiawu Zheng, Rongrong JiICML 2025
Builds on22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
Related papers
- AbstRaL: Augmenting LLMs' Reasoning by Reinforcing Abstract ThinkingSilin Gao, Antoine Bosselut, Samy Bengio, Emmanuel AbbeICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- A²RBench: An Automatic Paradigm for Formally Verifiable Abstract Reasoning Benchmark GenerationQingchuan Ma, Yuexiao Ma, Yongkang Xie, Tianyu Xie et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Temporal Knowledge Question Answering via Abstract Reasoning InductionZiyang Chen, Dongfang Li, Xiang Zhao, Baotian Hu et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
- AbsInstruct: Eliciting Abstraction Ability from LLMs through Explanation Tuning with Plausibility EstimationZhaowei Wang, Wei Fan, Qing Zong, Hongming Zhang et al.ACL 2024
- Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-ThoughtAbulhair Saparov, He HeICLR 2023 · 38 citations
