AbstRaL: Augmenting LLMs' Reasoning by Reinforcing Abstract Thinking
Silin Gao, Antoine Bosselut, Samy Bengio, Emmanuel Abbe
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs), especially smaller ones, often lack robustness in grade school math (GSM) reasoning. In particular, they tend to experience performance drops when faced with distribution shifts, such as changes to numerical or nominal variables, or insertions of distracting clauses. A possible strategy to address this involves generating synthetic data to further "instantiate" reasoning problems on potential variations. In this work, we instead focus on the strategy of "abstracting" reasoning problems. This not only helps counteract distribution shifts but also facilitates the connection to symbolic tools for deriving solutions. Focusing on GSM, we find that this abstraction process is better acquired through reinforcement learning (RL) than just supervised finetuning, which often fails to produce faithful abstractions. Our method, AbstRaLwhich promotes abstract reasoning in LLMs using RL on granular abstraction data-significantly mitigates performance degradation on recent GSM perturbation benchmarks. Besides, improving GSM robustness via AbstRaL is shown to also implicitly benefit LLMs' capabilities on OOD mathematical and general reasoning tasks, indicating that abstract thinking broadly enables better generalizability. * Work done during internship at Apple. 1 as verified by our analysis in §5.1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 12ddbdc4-625a-4a7a-be53-7ac8ff724d87Cited by top-tier papers2
- RL for Reasoning by Adaptively Revealing RationalesMohammad Hossein Amani, Aryo Lotfi, Nicolas Baldwin, Samy Bengio et al.ICLR 2026 · 19 citations
- Decoupling Understanding from Reasoning via Problem Space Mapping for Small-Scale Model ReasoningLi Wang, Changhao Zhang, Zengqi Xiu, Kai Lu et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
Related papers
- How Is LLM Reasoning Distracted by Irrelevant Context? An Analysis Using a Controlled BenchmarkMinglai Yang, Ethan Huang, Liang Zhang, Mihai Surdeanu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem SolversQintong Li, Leyang Cui, Xueliang Zhao, Lingpeng Kong et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
- Meaningful Learning: Enhancing Abstract Reasoning in Large Language Models via Generic Fact GuidanceKai Xiong, Xiao Ding, Ting Liu, Bing Qin et al.NeurIPS 2024
- The Emperor's New Reasoning: Format Imitation Overshadows Genuine Mathematical Understanding in SFTLinyao Yang, Jian-Tao Huang, Yafei Lu, Zhenhui Jessie Li et al.EMNLP 2025
- Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms?Gaël Gendron, Bao Trung Nguyen, Alex Yuxuan Peng, Michael J. Witbrock et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
