Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in Private (Deep) Learning
Chuan Guo, Brian Karrer, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Laurens van der Maaten
Abstract
Differential privacy is widely accepted as the de facto method for preventing data leakage in ML, and conventional wisdom suggests that it offers strong protection against privacy attacks. However, existing semantic guarantees for DP focus on membership inference, which may overestimate the adversary's capabilities and is not applicable when membership status itself is non-sensitive. In this paper, we derive the first semantic guarantees for DP mechanisms against training data reconstruction attacks under a formal threat model. We show that two distinct privacy accounting methods -- Renyi differential privacy and Fisher information leakage -- both offer strong semantic protection against data reconstruction attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7552509e-00d3-4dd1-8da3-57f657478d63Cited by top-tier papers26
- Bounding training data reconstruction in DP-SGDJamie Hayes, Borja Balle, Saeed MahloujifarNeurIPS 2023 · 73 citations
- Split-and-Denoise: Protect large language model inference with local differential privacyPeihua Mai, Ran Yan, Zhe Huang, Youjia Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 41 citations
- Privacy-Preserving Instructions for Aligning Large Language ModelsDa Yu, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, Zheng XuICML 2024 · 41 citations
- Unleashing the Power of Randomization in Auditing Differentially Private MLKrishna Pillutla, Galen Andrew, Peter Kairouz, H. Brendan McMahan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 35 citations
- Do SSL Models Have Déjà Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised LearningCasey Meehan, Florian Bordes, Pascal Vincent, Kamalika Chaudhuri et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
Builds on11
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
Related papers
- Analyzing Privacy Leakage in Machine Learning via Multiple Hypothesis Testing: A Lesson From FanoChuan Guo, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Maziar SanjabiICML 2023 · 20 citations
- Closed-Form Bounds for DP-SGD against Record-level InferenceGiovanni Cherubin, Boris Köpf, Andrew Paverd, Shruti Tople et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 2 citations
- The Inadequacy of Similarity-Based Privacy Metrics: Privacy Attacks Against "Truly Anonymous" Synthetic DatasetsGeorgi Ganev, Emiliano De CristofaroS&P 2025
- Defending Against Data Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning: An Information Theory ApproachQi Tan, Qi Li, Yi Zhao, Zhuotao Liu et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 10 citations
- Beyond Membership: Limitations of Add/Remove Adjacency in Differential PrivacyGauri Pradhan, Joonas Jälkö, Santiago Zanella-Béguelin, Antti HonkelaICLR 2026
