Fusion: Efficient and Secure Inference Resilient to Malicious Servers
Caiqin Dong, Jian Weng, Jia-Nan Liu, Yue Zhang, Yao Tong, Anjia Yang, Yudan Cheng, Shun Hu
Abstract
In secure machine learning inference, most of the schemes assume that the server is semi-honest (honestly following the protocol but attempting to infer additional information). However, the server may be malicious (e.g., using a low-quality model or deviating from the protocol) in the real world. Although a few studies have considered a malicious server that deviates from the protocol, they ignore the verification of model accuracy (where the malicious server uses a low-quality model) meanwhile preserving the privacy of both the server's model and the client's inputs. To address these issues, we propose Fusion, where the client mixes the public samples (which have known query results) with their own samples to be queried as the inputs of multi-party computation to jointly perform the secure inference. Since a server that uses a low-quality model or deviates from the protocol can only produce results that can be easily identified by the client, Fusion forces the server to behave honestly, thereby addressing all those aforementioned issues without leveraging expensive cryptographic techniques. Our evaluation indicates that Fusion is 48.06 faster and uses 30.90 less communication than the existing maliciously secure inference protocol (which currently does not support the verification of the model accuracy). In addition, to show the scalability, we conduct ImageNet-scale inference on the practical ResNet50 model and it costs 8.678 minutes and 10.117 GiB of communication in a WAN setting, which is 1.18 faster and has 2.64 less communication than those of the semi-honest protocol.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Don't Eject the Impostor: Fast Three-Party Computation With a Known CheaterAndreas Brüggemann, Oliver Schick, Thomas Schneider, Ajith Suresh et al.S&P 2024 · 13 citations
- SIGuard: Guarding Secure Inference with Post Data PrivacyXinqian Wang, Xiaoning Liu, Shangqi Lai, Xun Yi et al.NDSS 2025
- SHARK: Actively Secure Inference Using Function Secret SharingKanav Gupta, Nishanth Chandran, Divya Gupta, Jonathan Katz et al.S&P 2025
Builds on27
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- GAZELLE: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network InferenceChiraag Juvekar, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Anantha P. ChandrakasanUSENIX Security 2018 · 1,075 citations
- ABY3: A Mixed Protocol Framework for Machine LearningPayman Mohassel, Peter RindalCCS 2018 · 898 citations
- Oblivious Neural Network Predictions via MiniONN TransformationsJian Liu, Mika Juuti, Yao Lu, N. AsokanCCS 2017 · 800 citations
- Secure Outsourced Matrix Computation and Application to Neural NetworksXiaoqian Jiang, Miran Kim, Kristin E. Lauter, Yongsoo SongCCS 2018 · 359 citations
Related papers
- Muse: Secure Inference Resilient to Malicious ClientsRyan Lehmkuhl, Pratyush Mishra, Akshayaram Srinivasan, Raluca Ada PopaUSENIX Security 2021 · 115 citations
- SIMC: ML Inference Secure Against Malicious Clients at Semi-Honest CostNishanth Chandran, Divya Gupta, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Akash ShahUSENIX Security 2022
- Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model InconsistencyDario Pasquini, Danilo Francati, Giuseppe AtenieseCCS 2022 · 92 citations
- CRISP: An Efficient Cryptographic Framework for ML Inference Against Malicious ClientsXiaoyu Fang, Shihui Zheng, Lize GuNDSS 2026
- Efficient Differentially Private Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning via Hardness of Learning with ErrorsTimothy Stevens, Christian Skalka, Christelle Vincent, John H. Ring et al.USENIX Security 2022
