Automating Function-Level TARA for Automotive Full-Lifecycle Security
Yuqiao Yang, Yongzhao Zhang, Wenhao Liu, Jun Li, Pengtao Shi, DingYu Zhong, Jie Yang, Ting Chen, Sheng Cao, Yuntao Ren, Yongyue Wu, Xiaosong Zhang
Abstract
As modern vehicles evolve into intelligent and connected systems, their growing complexity introduces significant cybersecurity risks. Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment (TARA) has therefore become essential for managing these risks under mandatory regulations. However, existing TARA automation methods rely on static threat libraries, limiting their utility in the detailed, function-level analyses demanded by industry. This paper introduces DefenseWeaver, the first system that automates function-level TARA using component-specific details and large language models (LLMs). DefenseWeaver dynamically generates attack trees and risk evaluations from system configurations described in an extended OpenXSAM++ format, then employs a multi-agent framework to coordinate specialized LLM roles for more robust analysis. To further adapt to evolving threats and diverse standards, DefenseWeaver incorporates Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with expert-curated TARA reports. We validated DefenseWeaver through deployment in four automotive security projects, where it identified 11 critical attack paths, verified through penetration testing, and subsequently reported and remediated by the relevant automakers and suppliers. Additionally, DefenseWeaver demonstrated cross-domain adaptability, successfully applying to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and marine navigation systems. In comparison to human experts, DefenseWeaver outperformed manual attack tree generation across six assessment scenarios. Integrated into commercial cybersecurity platforms such as UAES and Xiaomi, DefenseWeaver has generated over 8,200 attack trees. These results highlight its ability to significantly reduce processing time, and its scalability and transformative impact on cybersecurity across industries.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7504d73e-a384-4d64-832d-0470fea3dd16Builds on9
- Phishpedia: A Hybrid Deep Learning Based Approach to Visually Identify Phishing WebpagesYun Lin, Ruofan Liu, Dinil Mon Divakaran, Jun Yang Ng et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 164 citations
- Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Matteo Paltenghi, Jia Le Tian, Michael Pradel et al.ICSE 2024 · 155 citations
- Language Agents with Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Play in the Werewolf GameZelai Xu, Chao Yu, Fei Fang, Yu Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 145 citations
- AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program ImprovementYuntong Zhang, Haifeng Ruan, Zhiyu Fan, Abhik RoychoudhuryISSTA 2024 · 96 citations
- Editable Scene Simulation for Autonomous Driving via Collaborative LLM-AgentsYuxi Wei, Zi Wang, Yifan Lu, Chenxin Xu et al.CVPR 2024 · 55 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Automotive Attack Surfaces: a Practitioners' PerspectivePengfei Jing, Zhiqiang Cai, Yingjie Cao, Le Yu et al.S&P 2024 · 16 citations
- SoK: Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI SystemsJuhee Kim, Wenbo Guo, Dawn SongUSENIX Security 2026
- TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM SystemsIshan Kavathekar, Hemang Jain, Ameya Rathod, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru et al.ACL 2026 · 16 citations
- AGrail: A Lifelong Agent Guardrail with Effective and Adaptive Safety DetectionWeidi Luo, Shenghong Dai, Xiaogeng Liu, Suman Banerjee et al.ACL 2025 · 41 citations
- AgentBreaker: Evaluating Context-Aware Indirect Prompt Injection Risks in Modern Web AgentsYongbi Son, Changoo Lee, Dongwon Shin, Byoungyoung Lee et al.ISSTA 2026
