Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social Relationships
David Jurgens, Agrima Seth, Jackson Sargent, Athena Aghighi, Michael Geraci
Abstract
Understanding interpersonal communication requires, in part, understanding the social context and norms in which a message is said. However, current methods for identifying offensive content in such communication largely operate independent of context, with only a few approaches considering community norms or prior conversation as context. Here, we introduce a new approach to identifying inappropriate communication by explicitly modeling the social relationship between the individuals. We introduce a new dataset of contextually-situated judgments of appropriateness and show that large language models can readily incorporate relationship information to accurately identify appropriateness in a given context. Using data from online conversations and movie dialogues, we provide insight into how the relationships themselves function as implicit norms and quantify the degree to which context-sensitivity is needed in different conversation settings. Further, we also demonstrate that contextual-appropriateness judgments are predictive of other social factors expressed in language such as condescension and politeness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 74f1ceea-8782-4846-9f6f-1231bd7dc796Cited by top-tier papers3
- Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET BenchmarkMinje Choi, Jiaxin Pei, Sagar Kumar, Chang Shu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 36 citations
- Are they lovers or friends? Evaluating LLMs' Social Reasoning in English and Korean DialoguesEunsu Kim, Junyeong Park, Juhyun Oh, Kiwoong Park et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- User Perceptions vs. Proxy LLM Judges: Privacy and Helpfulness in LLM Responses to Privacy-Sensitive ScenariosXiaoyuan Wu, Roshni Kaushik, Wenkai Li, Lujo Bauer et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on5
- MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained TransformersWenhui Wang, Furu Wei, Li Dong, Hangbo Bao et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,727 citations
- Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningHaokun Liu, Derek Tam, Mohammed Muqeeth, Jay Mohta et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,483 citations
- DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding SharingPengcheng He, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2023 · 394 citations
- Unifying Data Perspectivism and Personalization: An Application to Social NormsJoan Plepi, Béla Neuendorf, Lucie Flek, Charles WelchEMNLP 2022 · 4 citations
- PRIDE: Predicting Relationships in ConversationsAnna Tigunova, Paramita Mirza, Andrew Yates, Gerhard WeikumEMNLP 2021
Related papers
- Quantifying Intimacy in LanguageJiaxin Pei, David JurgensEMNLP 2020 · 44 citations
- Words Like Knives: Backstory-Personalized Modeling and Detection of Violent CommunicationJocelyn J. Shen, Akhila Yerukola, Xuhui Zhou, Cynthia Breazeal et al.EMNLP 2025 · 4 citations
- Please note that I'm just an AI: Analysis of Behavior Patterns of LLMs in (Non-)offensive Speech IdentificationEsra Dönmez, Thang Vu, Agnieszka FalenskaEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Feeling Rules in Language Models: Mapping Norms of Emotional Appropriateness Across Roles, Institutions, and IntensityGuangrui Fan, Dandan Liu, Aznul Qalid Md Sabri, Rui Zhang et al.ACL 2026
- Mind the Gesture: Evaluating AI Sensitivity to Culturally Offensive Non-Verbal GesturesAkhila Yerukola, Saadia Gabriel, Nanyun Peng, Maarten SapACL 2025 · 3 citations
