Please note that I'm just an AI: Analysis of Behavior Patterns of LLMs in (Non-)offensive Speech Identification
Esra Dönmez, Thang Vu, Agnieszka Falenska
Abstract
Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive or upsetting. Offensive speech is highly prevalent on online platforms. Being trained on online data, Large Language Models (LLMs) display undesirable behaviors, such as generating harmful text or failing to recognize it. Despite these shortcomings, the models are becoming a part of our everyday lives by being used as tools for information search, content creation, writing assistance, and many more. Furthermore, the research explores using LLMs in applications with immense social risk, such as latelife companions and online content moderators. Despite the potential harms from LLMs in such applications, whether LLMs can reliably identify offensive speech and how they behave when they fail are open questions. This work addresses these questions by probing sixteen widely used LLMs and showing that most fail to identify (non-)offensive online language. Our experiments reveal undesirable behavior patterns in the context of offensive speech detection, such as erroneous response generation, over-reliance on profanity, and failure to recognize stereotypes. Our work highlights the need for extensive documentation of model reliability, particularly in terms of the ability to detect offensive language.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 10d51aa5-74ef-44f3-b547-dd6c7b025c30Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- Pretraining Language Models with Human PreferencesTomasz Korbak, Kejian Shi, Angelica Chen, Rasika Vinayak Bhalerao et al.ICML 2023 · 287 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 254 citations
Related papers
- Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and OverrelianceSofia Eleni Spatharioti, David M. Rothschild, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. HofmanCHI 2025 · 28 citations
- Red Teaming Language Models with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Saffron Huang, H. Francis Song, Trevor Cai et al.EMNLP 2022 · 239 citations
- There is No War in Ba Sing Se: A Global Analysis of Content Moderation in Large Language ModelsFriedemann Lipphardt, Moonis Ali, Martin Banzer, Anja Feldmann et al.NDSS 2026 · 1 citation
- Imperceptible Content Poisoning in LLM-Powered ApplicationsQuan Zhang, Chijin Zhou, Gwihwan Go, Binqi Zeng et al.ASE 2024 · 3 citations
- ToxiCloakCN: Evaluating Robustness of Offensive Language Detection in Chinese with Cloaking PerturbationsYunze Xiao, Yujia Hu, Kenny T. W. Choo, Roy Ka-Wei LeeEMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
