MLPerf Inference Benchmark
Vijay Janapa Reddi, Christine Cheng, David Kanter, Peter Mattson, Guenther Schmuelling, Carole-Jean Wu, Brian Anderson, Maximilien Breughe, Mark Charlebois, William Chou, Ramesh Chukka, Cody Coleman
Abstract
Machine-learning (ML) hardware and software system demand is burgeoning. Driven by ML applications, the number of different ML inference systems has exploded. Over 100 organizations are building ML inference chips, and the systems that incorporate existing models span at least three orders of magnitude in power consumption and five orders of magnitude in performance; they range from embedded devices to data-center solutions. Fueling the hardware are a dozen or more software frameworks and libraries. The myriad combinations of ML hardware and ML software make assessing ML-system performance in an architecture-neutral, representative, and reproducible manner challenging. There is a clear need for industry-wide standard ML benchmarking and evaluation criteria. MLPerf Inference answers that call. In this paper, we present our benchmarking method for evaluating ML inference systems. Driven by more than 30 organizations as well as more than 200 ML engineers and practitioners, MLPerf prescribes a set of rules and best practices to ensure comparability across systems with wildly differing architectures. The first call for submissions garnered more than 600 reproducible inference-performance measurements from 14 organizations, representing over 30 systems that showcase a wide range of capabilities. The submissions attest to the benchmark’s flexibility and adaptability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers84
- Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and PruningElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhNeurIPS 2022 · 440 citations
- INFaaS: Automated Model-less Inference ServingFrancisco Romero, Qian Li, Neeraja J. Yadwadkar, Christos KozyrakisUSENIX ATC 2021 · 325 citations
- DeepRecSys: A System for Optimizing End-To-End At-Scale Neural Recommendation InferenceUdit Gupta, Samuel Hsia, Vikram Saraph, Xiaodong Wang et al.ISCA 2020 · 149 citations
- AutoFL: Enabling Heterogeneity-Aware Energy Efficient Federated LearningYoung Geun Kim, Carole-Jean WuMICRO 2021 · 84 citations
- AutoScale: Energy Efficiency Optimization for Stochastic Edge Inference Using Reinforcement LearningYoung Geun Kim, Carole-Jean WuMICRO 2020 · 80 citations
Related papers
- A Large-Scale Study of Model Integration in ML-Enabled Software SystemsYorick Sens, Henriette Knopp, Sven Peldszus, Thorsten BergerICSE 2025 · 3 citations
- ForecastBench: A Dynamic Benchmark of AI Forecasting CapabilitiesEzra Karger, Houtan Bastani, Yueh-Han Chen, Zachary Jacobs et al.ICLR 2025
- Green AI: Do Deep Learning Frameworks Have Different Costs?Stefanos Georgiou, Maria Kechagia, Tushar Sharma, Federica Sarro et al.ICSE 2022 · 90 citations
- Benchmarking Ultra-Low-Power μNPUsJosh Millar, Yushan Huang, Sarab S. Sethi, Hamed Haddadi et al.MobiCom 2025 · 13 citations
- LLM-Pilot: Characterize and Optimize Performance of your LLM Inference ServicesMalgorzata Lazuka, Andreea Anghel, Thomas P. ParnellSC 2024 · 17 citations
