ForecastBench: A Dynamic Benchmark of AI Forecasting Capabilities
Ezra Karger, Houtan Bastani, Yueh-Han Chen, Zachary Jacobs, Danny Halawi, Fred Zhang, Philip Tetlock
Abstract
Forecasts of future events are essential inputs into informed decision-making. Machine learning (ML) systems have the potential to deliver forecasts at scale, but there is no framework for evaluating the accuracy of ML systems on a standardized set of forecasting questions. To address this gap, we introduce ForecastBench: a dynamic benchmark that evaluates the accuracy of ML systems on an automatically generated and regularly updated set of 1,000 forecasting questions. To avoid any possibility of data leakage, ForecastBench is comprised solely of questions about future events that have no known answer at the time of submission. We quantify the capabilities of current ML systems by collecting forecasts from expert (human) forecasters, the general public, and LLMs on a random subset of questions from the benchmark (N = 200). While LLMs have achieved super-human performance on many benchmarks, they perform less well here: expert forecasters outperform the top-performing LLM (p-value < 0.001). We display system and human scores in a public leaderboard at www.forecastbench.org.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cdc78d86-8b6b-4410-a99b-9b78e682bd68Cited by top-tier papers13
- FutureX: An Advanced Live Benchmark for LLM Agents in Future PredictionZhiyuan Zeng, Jiashuo Liu, Siyuan Chen, Tianci He et al.ICLR 2026 · 51 citations
- LLM-as-a-Prophet: Understanding Predictive Intelligence with Prophet ArenaQingchuan Yang, Simon Mahns, Sida Li, Anri Gu et al.ICLR 2026 · 36 citations
- Predicting Empirical AI Research Outcomes with Language ModelsJiaxin Wen, Chenglei Si, Yueh-Han Chen, He He et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- Inferring Events from Time Series using Language ModelsMingtian Tan, Mike A. Merrill, Zachary Gottesman, Tim Althoff et al.ACL 2026 · 7 citations
- FutureOmni: Evaluating Future Forecasting from Omni-Modal Context for Multimodal LLMsQian Chen, Jinlan Fu, Changsong Li, Min zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on13
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language ModelsMing Jin, Shiyu Wang, Lintao Ma, Zhixuan Chu et al.ICLR 2024 · 915 citations
- Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series ForecastersNate Gruver, Marc Finzi, Shikai Qiu, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2023 · 898 citations
- A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingAbhimanyu Das, Weihao Kong, Rajat Sen, Yichen ZhouICML 2024 · 601 citations
Related papers
- Approaching Human-Level Forecasting with Language ModelsDanny Halawi, Fred Zhang, Yueh-Han Chen, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2024 · 142 citations
- LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM BenchmarkColin White, Samuel Dooley, Manley Roberts, Arka Pal et al.ICLR 2025
- TFRBench: A Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Forecasting SystemsMd Atik Ahamed, Mihir Parmar, Palash Goyal, Yiwen Song et al.ICML 2026
- Are LLMs Prescient? A Continuous Evaluation using Daily News as the OracleHui Dai, Ryan Teehan, Mengye RenICML 2025
- Pitfalls in Evaluating Language Model ForecastersDaniel Paleka, Shashwat Goel, Jonas Geiping, Florian TramèrICLR 2026 · 25 citations
