SOPE: Spectrum of Off-Policy Estimators
Christina J. Yuan, Yash Chandak, Stephen Giguere, Philip S. Thomas, Scott Niekum
Abstract
Many sequential decision making problems are high-stakes and require off-policy evaluation (OPE) of a new policy using historical data collected using some other policy. One of the most common OPE techniques that provides unbiased estimates is trajectory based importance sampling (IS). However, due to the high variance of trajectory IS estimates, importance sampling methods based on state-action visitation distributions (SIS) have recently been adopted. Unfortunately, while SIS often provides lower variance estimates for long horizons, estimating the stateaction distribution ratios can be challenging and lead to biased estimates. In this paper, we present a new perspective on this bias-variance trade-off and show the existence of a spectrum of estimators whose endpoints are SIS and IS. Additionally, we also establish a spectrum for doubly-robust and weighted version of these estimators. We provide empirical evidence that estimators in this spectrum can be used to trade-off between the bias and variance of IS and SIS and can achieve lower mean-squared error than both IS and SIS. 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Off-Policy Evaluation for Action-Dependent Non-stationary EnvironmentsYash Chandak, Shiv Shankar, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Bruno C. da Silva et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- OPERA: Automatic Offline Policy Evaluation with Re-weighted Aggregates of Multiple EstimatorsAllen Nie, Yash Chandak, Christina J. Yuan, Anirudhan Badrinath et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Pessimistic Data Integration for Policy EvaluationXiangkun Wu, Ting Li, Gholamali Aminian, Armin Behnamnia et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on6
- Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy EvaluationMasatoshi Uehara, Jiawei Huang, Nan JiangICML 2020 · 199 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation via the Regularized LagrangianMengjiao Yang, Ofir Nachum, Bo Dai, Lihong Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 125 citations
- Safe Imitation Learning via Fast Bayesian Reward Inference from PreferencesDaniel S. Brown, Russell Coleman, Ravi Srinivasan, Scott NiekumICML 2020 · 113 citations
- Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy EvaluationJustin Fu, Mohammad Norouzi, Ofir Nachum, George Tucker et al.ICLR 2021 · 112 citations
- Universal Off-Policy EvaluationYash Chandak, Scott Niekum, Bruno C. da Silva, Erik G. Learned-Miller et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 64 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy EvaluationHongyi Zhou, Josiah P. Hanna, Jin Zhu, Ying Yang et al.ICML 2025
- State Relevance for Off-Policy EvaluationSimon P. Shen, Yecheng Jason Ma, Omer Gottesman, Finale Doshi-VelezICML 2021 · 6 citations
- Minimax Value Interval for Off-Policy Evaluation and Policy OptimizationNan Jiang, Jiawei HuangNeurIPS 2020 · 68 citations
- Counterfactual-Augmented Importance Sampling for Semi-Offline Policy EvaluationShengpu Tang, Jenna WiensNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- Robust On-Policy Sampling for Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement LearningRujie Zhong, Duohan Zhang, Lukas Schäfer, Stefano V. Albrecht et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
