Off-Policy Evaluation for Action-Dependent Non-stationary Environments
Yash Chandak, Shiv Shankar, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Bruno C. da Silva, Emma Brunskill, Philip S. Thomas
Abstract
Methods for sequential decision-making are often built upon a foundational assumption that the underlying decision process is stationary. This limits the application of such methods because real-world problems are often subject to changes due to external factors (passive non-stationarity), changes induced by interactions with the system itself (active non-stationarity), or both (hybrid non-stationarity). In this work, we take the first steps towards the fundamental challenge of on-policy and off-policy evaluation amidst structured changes due to active, passive, or hybrid non-stationarity. Towards this goal, we make a higher-order stationarity assumption such that non-stationarity results in changes over time, but the way changes happen is fixed. We propose, OPEN, an algorithm that uses a double application of counterfactual reasoning and a novel importance-weighted instrument-variable regression to obtain both a lower bias and a lower variance estimate of the structure in the changes of a policy's past performances. Finally, we show promising results on how OPEN can be used to predict future performances for several domains inspired by real-world applications that exhibit non-stationarity. How can one provide a unified procedure for (off) policy evaluation amidst active, passive, or hybrid non-stationarity, when the underlying changes are structured? Contributions: To the best of our knowledge, our work presents the first steps towards addressing the fundamental challenge of off-policy evaluation amidst structured changes due to active or hybrid non-stationarity. Towards this goal, we make a higher-order stationarity assumption, under which the non-stationarity can result in changes over time, but the way changes happen is fixed. Under this assumption, we propose a model-free method that can infer the effect of the underlying nonstationarity on the past performances and use that to predict the future performances for a given policy. We call the proposed method OPEN: off-policy evaluation for non-stationary domains. On domains inspired by real-world applications, we show that OPEN often provides significantly better results not only in the presence of active and hybrid non-stationarity, but also for the passive setting where it even outperforms previous methods designed to handle only passive non-stationarity. OPEN primarily relies upon two key insights: (a) For active/hybrid non-stationarity, as the underlying changes may dependend on past interactions, the structure in the changes observed when executing the data collection policy can be different than if one were to execute the evaluation policy. To address this challenge, OPEN makes uses counterfactual reasoning twice and permits reduction of this off-policy evaluation problem to an auto-regression based forecasting problem. (b) Despite reduction to a more familiar auto-regression problem, in this setting naive least-squares based estimates of parameters for auto-regression suffers from high variance and can even be asymptotically biased. Finally, to address this challenge, OPEN uses a novel importance-weighted instrument-variable (auto-)regression technique to obtain asymptotically consistent and lower variance parameter estimates.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 690b07d1-0cc3-405a-ad27-afdb11045327Cited by top-tier papers2
- Off-Policy Selection for Initiating Human-Centric Experimental DesignGe Gao, Xi Yang, Qitong Gao, Song Ju et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for the Future under Non-StationarityTatsuhiro Shimizu, Kazuki Kawamura, Takanori Muroi, Yusuke Narita et al.KDD 2025
Builds on17
- Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy EvaluationMasatoshi Uehara, Jiawei Huang, Nan JiangICML 2020 · 199 citations
- Influence-Based Multi-Agent ExplorationTonghan Wang, Jianhao Wang, Yi Wu, Chongjie ZhangICLR 2020 · 156 citations
- PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient LearningAlekh Agarwal, Mikael Henaff, Sham M. Kakade, Wen SunNeurIPS 2020 · 126 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation via the Regularized LagrangianMengjiao Yang, Ofir Nachum, Bo Dai, Lihong Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 125 citations
- CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval EstimationBo Dai, Ofir Nachum, Yinlam Chow, Lihong Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 96 citations
Related papers
- Optimizing for the Future in Non-Stationary MDPsYash Chandak, Georgios Theocharous, Shiv Shankar, Martha White et al.ICML 2020 · 72 citations
- Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance SamplingYao Liu, Pierre-Luc Bacon, Emma BrunskillICML 2020 · 49 citations
- Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy EvaluationHongyi Zhou, Josiah P. Hanna, Jin Zhu, Ying Yang et al.ICML 2025
- OPERA: Automatic Offline Policy Evaluation with Re-weighted Aggregates of Multiple EstimatorsAllen Nie, Yash Chandak, Christina J. Yuan, Anirudhan Badrinath et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- An Instrumental Variable Approach to Confounded Off-Policy EvaluationYang Xu, Jin Zhu, Chengchun Shi, Shikai Luo et al.ICML 2023 · 24 citations
