PruneRAG: Confidence-Guided Query Decomposition Trees for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Shuguang Jiao, Xinyu Xiao, Yunfan Wei, Shuhan Qi, Chengkai Huang, Quan Z. Sheng, Lina Yao
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a powerful framework for enhancing large language models in knowledgeintensive and reasoning tasks. However, as reasoning chains deepen or search trees expand, RAG systems often face two persistent failures: evidence forgetting, where retrieved knowledge is not effectively used, and inefficiency, caused by uncontrolled query expansions and redundant retrieval. These issues reveal a critical gap between retrieval and evidence utilization in current RAG architectures. We propose PruneRAG, a confidence-guided query decomposition framework that builds a structured query decomposition tree to perform stable and efficient reasoning. PruneRAG introduces three key mechanisms: adaptive node expansion that regulates tree width and depth, confidence-guided decisions that accept reliable answers and prune uncertain branches, and fine-grained retrieval that extracts entity-level anchors to improve retrieval precision. Together, these components preserve salient evidence throughout multi-hop reasoning while significantly reducing retrieval overhead. To better analyze evidence misuse, we define the Evidence Forgetting Rate as a metric to quantify cases where golden evidence is retrieved but not correctly used. Extensive experiments across various multi-hop QA benchmarks show that PruneRAG achieves superior accuracy and efficiency over state-of-the-art baselines. The code is publicly available. 1 CCS Concepts • Information systems → Information retrieval.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 72ab2fb6-83a4-4900-810a-934f84ed527cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
Related papers
- You Don't Need Pre-Built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning StructuresShengyuan Chen, Chuang Zhou, Zheng Yuan, Qinggang Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 14 citations
- DeepRAG: Thinking to Retrieve Step by Step for Large Language ModelsXinyan Guan, Jiali Zeng, Fandong Meng, Chunlei Xin et al.ICLR 2026 · 30 citations
- PRoH: Dynamic Planning and Reasoning over Knowledge Hypergraphs for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationXiangjun Zai, Xingyu Tan, Xiaoyang Wang, Qing Liu et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
- LiR3AG: A Lightweight Rerank Reasoning Strategy Framework for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationGuo Chen, Junjie Huang, Huaijin Xie, Fei Sun et al.AAAI 2026
- Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Evidence Tree SearchHao Sun, Hengyi Cai, Yuchen Li, Xuanbo Fan et al.ACL 2025 · 7 citations
