Purifying Multimodal Retrieval: Fragment-Level Evidence Selection for RAG
Xihang Wang, Zihan Wang, Chengkai Huang, Cao Liu, Ke Zeng, Quan Z. Sheng, Lina Yao
Abstract
Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) is widely adopted for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with external evidence to reduce hallucinations. Despite its success, most existing MRAG frameworks treat retrieved evidence as indivisible documents, implicitly assuming that all content within a document is equally informative. In practice, however, sometimes only a small fraction of a document is relevant to a given query, while the remaining content introduces substantial noise that may lead to performance degradation. We address this fundamental limitation by reframing MRAG as a fine-grained evidence selection problem. We propose Fragment-level Evidence Selection for RAG (FES-RAG), a framework that selects atomic multimodal fragments rather than entire documents as grounding evidence. FES-RAG decomposes retrieved multimodal documents into sentence-level textual fragments and region-level visual fragments, enabling precise identification of evidence that directly supports generation. To guide fragment selection, we introduce Fragment Information Gain (FIG), a principled metric that measures the marginal contribution of each fragment to the MLLM's generation confidence. Based on FIG, we distill fragment-level utility judgments from a high-capacity MLLM into a lightweight selector, achieving accurate evidence selection with low inference overhead. Experiments on the M2RAG benchmark show that FES-RAG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art document-level MRAG methods, achieving up to 27% relative improvement in CIDEr. By selecting fewer yet more informative fragments, our approach substantially reduces context length while improving factual accuracy and generation coherence.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dae87c69-251d-4990-b316-4fc174bbbd11Builds on17
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
Related papers
- RegionRAG: Region-level Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Visual Document UnderstandingYinglu Li, Zhiying Lu, Zhihang Liu, Yiwei Sun et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Modal ContextsZhenghao Liu, Xingsheng Zhu, Tianshuo Zhou, Xinyi Zhang et al.ACM MM 2025 · 4 citations
- MARA: A Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Document Question AnsweringHui Wu, Haoquan Zhai, Yuchen Li, Hengyi Cai et al.ACM MM 2025
- Are We on the Right Way to Assess Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation?Wenxuan Shen, Mingjia Wang, Yaochen Wang, Dongping Chen et al.AAAI 2026
- Utility-Oriented Visual Evidence Selection for Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented GenerationWeiqing Luo, Zongye Hu, Xiao Wang, Zhiyuan Yu et al.ACL 2026
