From User Surveys to Telemetry-Driven AI Agents: Exploring the Potential of Personalized Productivity Solutions
Subigya Nepal, Javier Hernandez, Talie Massachi, Kael Rowan, Judith Amores, Jina Suh, Gonzalo Ramos, Brian Houck, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Mary P. Czerwinski
Abstract
Information workers increasingly struggle with productivity challenges in modern workplaces, facing difficulties in managing time and effectively utilizing workplace analytics data for behavioral improvement. Despite the availability of productivity metrics through enterprise tools, workers often fail to translate this data into actionable insights. We present a comprehensive, user-centric approach to address these challenges through AI-based productivity agents tailored to users' needs. Utilizing a two-phase method, we first conducted a survey with 363 participants, exploring various aspects of productivity, communication style, agent approach, personality traits, personalization, and privacy. Drawing on the survey insights, we developed a GPT-4 powered personalized productivity agent that utilizes telemetry data gathered via Viva Insights from information workers to provide tailored assistance. We compared its performance with alternative productivity-assistive tools, such as dashboard and narrative, in a study involving 40 participants.
Our findings highlight the importance of user-centric design, adaptability, and the balance between personalization and privacy in AI-assisted productivity tools. By building on these insights, our work provides important guidance for developing more effective productivity solutions, ultimately leading to optimized efficiency and user experiences for information workers.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; User studies; Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing; Empirical studies in ubiquitous and mobile computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- MindScape Study: Integrating LLM and Behavioral Sensing for Personalized AI-Driven Journaling ExperiencesSubigya Nepal, Arvind Pillai, William Campbell, Talie Massachi et al.UbiComp 2025 · 45 citations
- Algorithmic Power or Punishment: Information Worker Perspectives on Passive Sensing Enabled AI Phenotyping of Performance and WellbeingVedant Das Swain, Lan Gao, William A. Wood, Srikruthi C. Matli et al.CHI 2023 · 42 citations
- Understanding the Role of Large Language Models in Personalizing and Scaffolding Strategies to Combat Academic ProcrastinationAnanya Bhattacharjee, Yuchen Zeng, Sarah Yi Xu, Dana Kulzhabayeva et al.CHI 2024 · 39 citations
- Detecting Job Promotion in Information Workers Using Mobile SensingSubigya Nepal, Shayan Mirjafari, Gonzalo J. Martínez, Pino G. Audia et al.UbiComp 2020 · 26 citations
- Focused Time Saves Nine: Evaluating Computer-Assisted Protected Time for Hybrid Information WorkVedant Das Swain, Javier Hernandez, Brian Houck, Koustuv Saha et al.CHI 2023 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer WorkflowsValerie Chen, Ameet Talwalkar, Robert Brennan, Graham NeubigCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploring the Design Space of AI Agents for Human-as-the-Unit Privacy ManagementEryue Xu, Tianshi LiCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Are We Automating the Joy Out of Work? Designing AI to Augment Work, Not MeaningJaspreet Ranjit, Ke Zhou, Swabha Swayamdipta, Daniele QuerciaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Generative AI in Knowledge Work: Design Implications for Data Navigation and Decision-MakingBhada Yun, Dana Feng, Ace S. Chen, Afshin Nikzad et al.CHI 2025 · 23 citations
- Sensible and Sensitive AI for Worker Wellbeing: Factors that Inform Adoption and Resistance for Information WorkersVedant Das Swain, Lan Gao, Abhirup Mondal, Gregory D. Abowd et al.CHI 2024 · 22 citations
