"Having Lunch Now": Understanding How Users Engage with a Proactive Agent for Daily Planning and Self-Reflection
Adnan Abbas, Caleb Wohn, Arnav Jagtap, Eugenia Ha Rim Rho, Young-Ho Kim, Sang Won Lee
Abstract
Conversational agents have been studied as tools to scaffold planning and self-reflection for productivity and well-being. While prior work has demonstrated positive outcomes, we still lack a clear understanding of what drives these results and how users behave and communicate with agents that act as coaches rather than assistants. Such understanding is critical for designing interactions in which agents foster meaningful behavioral change. We conducted a 14-day longitudinal study with 12 participants using a proactive agent that initiated regular check-ins to support daily planning and reflection. Our findings reveal diverse interaction patterns: participants accepted or negotiated suggestions, developed shared mental models, reported progress, and at times resisted or disengaged. We also identified problematic aspects of the agent's behavior, including rigidity, premature turn-taking, and overpromising. Our work contributes to understanding how people interact with a proactive, coach-like agent and offers design considerations for facilitating effective behavioral change.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; Natural language interfaces.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 12819be1-dfda-4813-b397-a71f0ce8d81fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on24
- Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Deploying Conversational AI Leveraging Large Language Models for Public Health InterventionEunkyung Jo, Daniel A. Epstein, Hyunhoon Jung, Young-Ho KimCHI 2023 · 167 citations
- Working With AI to Persuade: Examining a Large Language Model's Ability to Generate Pro-Vaccination MessagesElise Karinshak, Sunny Xun Liu, Joon Sung Park, Jeffrey T. HancockCSCW 2023 · 163 citations
- Effects of Persuasive Dialogues: Testing Bot Identities and Inquiry StrategiesWeiyan Shi, Xuewei Wang, Yoojung Oh, Jingwen Zhang et al.CHI 2020 · 93 citations
- GPTCoach: Towards LLM-Based Physical Activity CoachingMatthew Jörke, Shardul Sapkota, Lyndsea Warkenthien, Niklas Vainio et al.CHI 2025 · 89 citations
- Reflection in Theory and Reflection in Practice: An Exploration of the Gaps in Reflection Support among Personal Informatics AppsJanghee Cho, Tian Xu, Abigail Zimmermann-Niefield, Stephen VoidaCHI 2022 · 84 citations
Related papers
- Supporting Effective Goal Setting with LLM-Based ChatbotsMichel Schimpf, Sebastian Maier, Anton Wyrowski, Lara Christoforakos et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- An LLM-Based Motivation-Aware Framework For AI Coaching For Behaviour ChangeVan Hoang, Eoin Rogers, Robert J. RossCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Introspectus AI: Long-term AI-Driven Dialogue Training To Promote Self-ReflectionShengyin Li, Guangyao Zhu, Danyang Peng, Ximing Shen et al.CSCW 2025 · 5 citations
- Large Language Model Agents for Improving Engagement with Behavior Change Interventions: Application to Digital MindfulnessHarsh Kumar, Suhyeon Yoo, Angela M. Zavaleta Bernuy, Jiakai Shi et al.CSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- When Designers Sweat: Behavioral Traces of GenAI Co-CreationElena Cavallin, Simone SpagnolCHI 2026 · 2 citations
