CLAUSE: Agentic Neuro-Symbolic Knowledge Graph Reasoning via Dynamic Learnable Context Engineering
Yang Zhao, Chengxiao Dai, Wei Zhuo, Yue Xiu, Dusit Niyato
Abstract
Knowledge graphs provide structured context for multi‑hop question answering, but deployed systems must balance answer accuracy with strict latency and cost targets while preserving provenance. Static ‑hop expansions and ``think‑longer'' prompting often over‑retrieve, inflate context, and yield unpredictable runtime. Thus, we introduce CLAUSE, an agentic three-agent neuro‑symbolic framework that treats context construction as a sequential decision process over knowledge graphs, deciding what to expand, which paths to follow or backtrack, what evidence to keep and when to stop. Latency (interaction steps) and prompt cost (selected tokens) are exposed as user‑specified budgets or prices, allowing per‑query adaptation to trade‑offs among accuracy, latency, and cost without retraining. CLAUSE employs the proposed Lagrangian‑Constrained Multi‑Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (LC‑MAPPO) algorithm to coordinate three agents: Subgraph Architect, Path Navigator, and Context Curator, so that subgraph construction, reasoning paths discovery, and evidence selection are jointly optimized under per‑query's resource budgets on edge edits, interaction steps, and selected tokens. Across HotpotQA, MetaQA, and FactKG, CLAUSE yields higher EM@1 while reducing subgraph growth and end-to-end latency at equal or lower token budgets. On MetaQA-2-hop, relative to the strongest RAG baseline (GraphRAG), CLAUSE achieves EM@1 with 18.6% lower latency, and 40.9% lower edge growth. The resulting contexts are compact, provenance‑preserving, and deliver predictable performance under deployment constraints.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
Related papers
- ProgRAG: Hallucination-Resistant Progressive Retrieval and Reasoning over Knowledge GraphsMinbae Park, Hyemin Yang, Jeonghyun Kim, Kunsoo Park et al.AAAI 2026
- S-Path-RAG: Semantic-Aware Shortest-Path Retrieval Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Knowledge Graph Question AnsweringRong Fu, Yemin Wang, Tianxiang Xu, Yongtai Liu et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
- Temporal Evidence Chain for Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering with Large Language ModelsShihao Liu, Xiaofei Zhou, Bo Wang, Geyuan ZhangACL 2026
- Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Muti-hop Reasoning for Temporal Knowledge Question AnsweringWuzhenghong Wen, Chao Xue, Su Pan, Yuwei Sun et al.AAAI 2026
- RAG-on-a-Diet: A Reinforcement Learning-Based Dynamic Resource Optimization Framework for RAGHongwen Ding, Yizheng ZhaoACL 2026
