Enhancing Smart Contract Security Analysis with Execution Property Graphs
Kaihua Qin, Zhe Ye, Zhun Wang, Weilin Li, Liyi Zhou, Chao Zhang, Dawn Song, Arthur Gervais
Abstract
Smart contract vulnerabilities have led to significant financial losses, with their increasing complexity rendering outright prevention of hacks increasingly challenging. This trend highlights the crucial need for advanced forensic analysis and real-time intrusion detection, where dynamic analysis plays a key role in dissecting smart contract executions. Therefore, there is a pressing need for a unified and generic representation of smart contract executions, complemented by an efficient methodology that enables the modeling and identification of a broad spectrum of emerging attacks. We introduce Clue, a dynamic analysis framework specifically designed for the Ethereum virtual machine. Central to Clue is its ability to capture critical runtime information during contract executions, employing a novel graph-based representation, the Execution Property Graph. A key feature of Clue is its innovative graph traversal technique, which is adept at detecting complex attacks, including (read-only) reentrancy and price manipulation. Evaluation results reveal Clue's superior performance with high true positive rates and low false positive rates, outperforming state-of-the-art tools. Furthermore, Clue's efficiency positions it as a valuable tool for both forensic analysis and real-time intrusion detection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 70fbd1d5-4385-4a39-a6c4-a6bb65a1daf7Cited by top-tier papers3
- ConFuzz: Towards Large Scale Fuzz Testing of Smart Contracts in EthereumTaiyu Wong, Chao Zhang, Yuandong Ni, Mingsen Luo et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 10 citations
- LookAhead: Preventing DeFi Attacks via Unveiling Adversarial ContractsShoupeng Ren, Lipeng He, Tianyu Tu, Di Wu et al.FSE 2025 · 3 citations
- SymGPT: Auditing Smart Contracts via Combining Symbolic Execution with Large Language ModelsShihao Xia, Mengting He, Shuai Shao, Tingting Yu et al.OOPSLA 2026
Builds on16
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 298 citations
- sFuzz: an efficient adaptive fuzzer for solidity smart contractsTai D. Nguyen, Long H. Pham, Jun Sun, Yun Lin et al.ICSE 2020 · 260 citations
- Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Vulnerable Does Not Imply ExploitedDaniel Perez, Benjamin LivshitsUSENIX Security 2021 · 150 citations
Related papers
- TXSPECTOR: Uncovering Attacks in Ethereum from TransactionsMengya Zhang, Xiaokuan Zhang, Yinqian Zhang, Zhiqiang LinUSENIX Security 2020
- SCVHunter: Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Based on Heterogeneous Graph Attention NetworkFeng Luo, Ruijie Luo, Ting Chen, Ao Qiao et al.ICSE 2024 · 38 citations
- AdvSCanner: Generating Adversarial Smart Contracts to Exploit Reentrancy Vulnerabilities Using LLM and Static AnalysisYin Wu, Xiaofei Xie, Chenyang Peng, Dijun Liu et al.ASE 2024 · 9 citations
- Efficiently Detecting Reentrancy Vulnerabilities in Complex Smart ContractsZexu Wang, Jiachi Chen, Yanlin Wang, Yu Zhang et al.FSE 2024 · 27 citations
- Uncover the Premeditated Attacks: Detecting Exploitable Reentrancy Vulnerabilities by Identifying Attacker ContractsShuo Yang, Jiachi Chen, Mingyuan Huang, Zibin Zheng et al.ICSE 2024 · 24 citations
