An Unsupervised Way to Understand Artifact Generating Internal Units in Generative Neural Networks
Haedong Jeong, Jiyeon Han, Jaesik Choi
Abstract
Despite significant improvements on the image generation performance of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), generations with low visual fidelity still have been observed. As widely used metrics for GANs focus more on the overall performance of the model, evaluation on the quality of individual generations or detection of defective generations is challenging. While recent studies try to detect featuremap units that cause artifacts and evaluate individual samples, these approaches require additional resources such as external networks or a number of training data to approximate the real data manifold. In this work, we propose the concept of local activation, and devise a metric on the local activation to detect artifact generations without additional supervision. We empirically verify that our approach can detect and correct artifact generations from GANs with various datasets. Finally, we discuss a geometrical analysis to partially reveal the relation between the proposed concept and low visual fidelity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Refining Diffusion Planner for Reliable Behavior Synthesis by Automatic Detection of Infeasible PlansKyowoon Lee, Seongun Kim, Jaesik ChoiNeurIPS 2023 · 31 citations
- Resisting Stochastic Risks in Diffusion Planners with the Trajectory Aggregation TreeLang Feng, Pengjie Gu, Bo An, Gang PanICML 2024 · 15 citations
Builds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- GANSpace: Discovering Interpretable GAN ControlsErik Härkönen, Aaron Hertzmann, Jaakko Lehtinen, Sylvain ParisNeurIPS 2020 · 1,049 citations
- An Efficient Explorative Sampling Considering the Generative Boundaries of Deep Generative Neural NetworksGiyoung Jeon, Haedong Jeong, Jaesik ChoiAAAI 2020 · 13 citations
- Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural NetworksAli Tousi, Haedong Jeong, Jiyeon Han, Hwanil Choi et al.CVPR 2021
- Interpreting the Latent Space of GANs for Semantic Face EditingYujun Shen, Jinjin Gu, Xiaoou Tang, Bolei ZhouCVPR 2020
Related papers
- DeSRA: Detect and Delete the Artifacts of GAN-based Real-World Super-Resolution ModelsLiangbin Xie, Xintao Wang, Xiangyu Chen, Gen Li et al.ICML 2023 · 53 citations
- Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image RecognitionJoel Frank, Thorsten Eisenhofer, Lea Schönherr, Asja Fischer et al.ICML 2020 · 848 citations
- FrePGAN: Robust Deepfake Detection Using Frequency-Level PerturbationsYonghyun Jeong, Doyeon Kim, Youngmin Ro, Jongwon ChoiAAAI 2022 · 159 citations
- On the Frequency Bias of Generative ModelsKatja Schwarz, Yiyi Liao, Andreas GeigerNeurIPS 2021 · 117 citations
- Exploring the Relationship Between Samples and Masks for Robust Defect LocalizationJiang Lin, Hui Xue, Fanxiu Sun, Yaping YanAAAI 2025
