The Sample Complexity of Best-k Items Selection from Pairwise Comparisons
Wenbo Ren, Jia Liu, Ness B. Shroff
Abstract
This paper studies the sample complexity (aka number of comparisons) bounds for the active best-k items selection from pairwise comparisons. From a given set of items, the learner can make pairwise comparisons on every pair of items, and each comparison returns an independent noisy result about the preferred item. At any time, the learner can adaptively choose a pair of items to compare according to past observations (i.e., active learning). The learner's goal is to find the (approximately) best-k items with a given confidence, while trying to use as few comparisons as possible. In this paper, we study two problems: (i) finding the probably approximately correct (PAC) best-k items and (ii) finding the exact best-k items, both under strong stochastic transitivity and stochastic triangle inequality. For PAC best-k items selection, we first show a lower bound and then propose an algorithm whose sample complexity upper bound matches the lower bound up to a constant factor. For the exact best-k items selection, we first prove a worst-instance lower bound. We then propose two algorithms based on our PAC best items selection algorithms: one works for k = 1 and is sample complexity optimal up to a loglog factor, and the other works for all values of k and is sample complexity optimal up to a log factor. The second problem is the exact best-k items selection. Under SST, since there is a strict order over these n items, the best-k items are unique. The best-k items are r 1 , r 2 , ..., r k , and finding the best-k items is to find the set r 1 , r 2 , ..., r k . We do not need to order these best-k items but only need to
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Identification of the Generalized Condorcet Winner in Multi-dueling BanditsBjörn Haddenhorst, Viktor Bengs, Eyke HüllermeierNeurIPS 2021 · 14 citations
- Finding Optimal Arms in Non-stochastic Combinatorial Bandits with Semi-bandit Feedback and Finite BudgetJasmin Brandt, Viktor Bengs, Björn Haddenhorst, Eyke HüllermeierNeurIPS 2022 · 9 citations
- Sample Complexity Bounds for Active Ranking from Multi-wise ComparisonsWenbo Ren, Jia Liu, Ness B. ShroffNeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations
- Dueling Bandits with Team ComparisonsLee Cohen, Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin, Yishay MansourNeurIPS 2021 · 1 citation
- Achieving Nearly-Optimal Regret and Sample Complexity in Dueling Bandits with Applications in Online RecommendationsLanjihong Ma, Yao-Xiang Ding, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Zhi-Hua ZhouKDD 2025
Builds on1
Related papers
- Active Ranking without Strong Stochastic TransitivityHao Lou, Tao Jin, Yue Wu, Pan Xu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- Optimal Top- Identification from Pairwise ComparisonsMotti Goldberger, Nils RudiICML 2026
- Ranking with Multiple Oracles: From Weak to Strong Stochastic TransitivityTao Jin, Yue Wu, Quanquan Gu, Farzad FarnoudICML 2025
- Active Ranking and Matchmaking, with Perfect MatchingsHafedh El Ferchichi, Matthieu Lerasle, Vianney PerchetICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Active preference learning for ordering items in- and out-of-sampleHerman Bergström, Emil Carlsson, Devdatt P. Dubhashi, Fredrik D. JohanssonNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
