Differentiable and Transportable Structure Learning
Jeroen Berrevoets, Nabeel Seedat, Fergus Imrie, Mihaela van der Schaar
Abstract
Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) encode a lot of information about a particular distribution in their structure. However, compute required to infer these structures is typically super-exponential in the number of variables, as inference requires a sweep of a combinatorially large space of potential structures. That is, until recent advances made it possible to search this space using a differentiable metric, drastically reducing search time. While this technique -- named NOTEARS -- is widely considered a seminal work in DAG-discovery, it concedes an important property in favour of differentiability: transportability. To be transportable, the structures discovered on one dataset must apply to another dataset from the same domain. We introduce D-Struct which recovers transportability in the discovered structures through a novel architecture and loss function while remaining fully differentiable. Because D-Struct remains differentiable, our method can be easily adopted in existing differentiable architectures, as was previously done with NOTEARS. In our experiments, we empirically validate D-Struct with respect to edge accuracy and structural Hamming distance in a variety of settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7035e04c-176f-42fa-a1ad-7084eb32099dCited by top-tier papers2
- Meta-D2AG: Causal Graph Learning with Interventional Dynamic DataTian Gao, Songtao Lu, Junkyu Lee, Elliot Nelson et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Differentiable Structure Learning with Ancestral ConstraintsTaiyu Ban, Changxin Rong, Xiangyu Wang, Lyuzhou Chen et al.ICML 2025
Builds on11
- Gradient-Based Neural DAG LearningSébastien Lachapelle, Philippe Brouillard, Tristan Deleu, Simon Lacoste-JulienICLR 2020 · 337 citations
- On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGsIgnavier Ng, AmirEmad Ghassami, Kun ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 306 citations
- DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity CharacterizationKevin Bello, Bryon Aragam, Pradeep RavikumarNeurIPS 2022 · 222 citations
- DECAF: Generating Fair Synthetic Data Using Causally-Aware Generative NetworksBoris van Breugel, Trent Kyono, Jeroen Berrevoets, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2021 · 174 citations
- MIRACLE: Causally-Aware Imputation via Learning Missing Data MechanismsTrent Kyono, Yao Zhang, Alexis Bellot, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2021 · 105 citations
Related papers
- DARING: Differentiable Causal Discovery with Residual IndependenceYue He, Peng Cui, Zheyan Shen, Renzhe Xu et al.KDD 2021 · 28 citations
- Constraint-Free Structure Learning with Smooth Acyclic OrientationsRiccardo Massidda, Francesco Landolfi, Martina Cinquini, Davide BacciuICLR 2024 · 10 citations
- Directed Acyclic Graph Structure Learning from Dynamic GraphsShaohua Fan, Shuyang Zhang, Xiao Wang, Chuan ShiAAAI 2023 · 9 citations
- DAGs with No Curl: An Efficient DAG Structure Learning ApproachYue Yu, Tian Gao, Naiyu Yin, Qiang JiICML 2021 · 77 citations
- DAGs with No Fears: A Closer Look at Continuous Optimization for Learning Bayesian NetworksDennis Wei, Tian Gao, Yue YuNeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
