Constraint-Free Structure Learning with Smooth Acyclic Orientations
Riccardo Massidda, Francesco Landolfi, Martina Cinquini, Davide Bacciu
Abstract
The structure learning problem consists of fitting data generated by a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) to correctly reconstruct its arcs. In this context, differentiable approaches constrain or regularize the optimization problem using a continuous relaxation of the acyclicity property. The computational cost of evaluating graph acyclicity is cubic on the number of nodes and significantly affects scalability. In this paper we introduce COSMO, a constraint-free continuous optimization scheme for acyclic structure learning. At the core of our method, we define a differentiable approximation of an orientation matrix parameterized by a single priority vector. Differently from previous work, our parameterization fits a smooth orientation matrix and the resulting acyclic adjacency matrix without evaluating acyclicity at any step. Despite the absence of explicit constraints, we prove that COSMO always converges to an acyclic solution. In addition to being asymptotically faster, our empirical analysis highlights how COSMO performance on graph reconstruction compares favorably with competing structure learning methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 85e1b5c9-faa7-4b96-826b-d3db7c3abed2Cited by top-tier papers2
- Causal Discovery via Bayesian OptimizationBao Duong, Sunil Gupta, Thin NguyenICLR 2025
- MARLIN: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Incremental DAG DiscoveryDong Li, Zhengzhang Chen, Xujiang Zhao, Linlin Yu et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on10
- Gradient-Based Neural DAG LearningSébastien Lachapelle, Philippe Brouillard, Tristan Deleu, Simon Lacoste-JulienICLR 2020 · 337 citations
- Differentiable Causal Discovery from Interventional DataPhilippe Brouillard, Sébastien Lachapelle, Alexandre Lacoste, Simon Lacoste-Julien et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 295 citations
- DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity CharacterizationKevin Bello, Bryon Aragam, Pradeep RavikumarNeurIPS 2022 · 222 citations
- Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy to GameAlexander G. Reisach, Christof Seiler, Sebastian WeichwaldNeurIPS 2021 · 213 citations
- Amortized Inference for Causal Structure LearningLars Lorch, Scott Sussex, Jonas Rothfuss, Andreas Krause et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 118 citations
Related papers
- DAGs with No Curl: An Efficient DAG Structure Learning ApproachYue Yu, Tian Gao, Naiyu Yin, Qiang JiICML 2021 · 77 citations
- Markov Equivalence and Consistency in Differentiable Structure LearningChang Deng, Kevin Bello, Pradeep Ravikumar, Bryon AragamNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGsIgnavier Ng, AmirEmad Ghassami, Kun ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 306 citations
- CoLiDE: Concomitant Linear DAG EstimationSeyed Saman Saboksayr, Gonzalo Mateos, Mariano TepperICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- Truncated Matrix Power Iteration for Differentiable DAG LearningZhen Zhang, Ignavier Ng, Dong Gong, Yuhang Liu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
