PBFuzz: Agentic Directed Fuzzing for PoV Generation
Haochen Zeng, Andrew Bao, Jiajun Cheng, Chengyu Song
Abstract
Proof-of-Vulnerability (PoV) input generation is a critical task in software security and supports downstream applications such as path generation and validation. Generating a PoV input requires solving two sets of constraints: (1) reachability constraints for reaching vulnerable code locations, and (2) triggering constraints for activating the target vulnerability. Existing approaches, including directed greybox fuzzing and LLM-assisted fuzzing, struggle to efficiently satisfy these constraints. This work presents an agentic method that mimics human experts. Human analysts iteratively study code to extract semantic reachability and triggering constraints, form hypotheses about PoV triggering strategies, encode them as test inputs, and refine their understanding using debugging feedback. We automate this process with an agentic directed fuzzing framework called PBFuzz. PBFuzz tackles four challenges in agentic PoV generation: autonomous code reasoning for semantic constraint extraction, custom program-analysis tools for targeted inference, persistent memory to avoid hypothesis drift, and property-based testing for efficient constraint solving while preserving input structure. Experiments on the Magma benchmark show strong results. PBFuzz triggered 57 vulnerabilities, surpassing all baselines, and uniquely triggered 17 vulnerabilities not exposed by existing fuzzers. PBFuzz achieved this within a 30-minute budget per target, while conventional approaches use 24 hours. Median time-to-exposure was 339 seconds for PBFuzz versus 8680 seconds for AFL++ with CmpLog, giving a 25.6× efficiency improvement with an API cost of $1.83 per vulnerability. In real-world application, PBFuzz reproduced three FFmpeg 1-day CVEs that had no public PoVs. CCS Concepts • Security and privacy → Software security engineering; Vulnerability scanners; • Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging; • Theory of computation → Program analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6feae7bb-2244-42a1-b681-96f5bd59986aBuilds on31
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Hawkeye: Towards a Desired Directed Grey-box FuzzerHongxu Chen, Yinxing Xue, Yuekang Li, Bihuan Chen et al.CCS 2018 · 335 citations
- Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language ModelsYinlin Deng, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Haoran Peng, Chenyuan Yang et al.ISSTA 2023 · 253 citations
- Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Matteo Paltenghi, Jia Le Tian, Michael Pradel et al.ICSE 2024 · 155 citations
- UNIFUZZ: A Holistic and Pragmatic Metrics-Driven Platform for Evaluating FuzzersYuwei Li, Shouling Ji, Yuan Chen, Sizhuang Liang et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 142 citations
Related papers
- PAGENT: Program Analysis Guided LLM Agent for Proof-of-Concept GenerationAchintya Desai, Md Shafiuzzaman, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik BultanISSTA 2026
- It Takes Two: Option-Aware Directed Greybox Fuzzing for Vulnerability PoC GenerationSusheng Wu, Xin Hu, Yiheng Cao, Zhuotong Zhou et al.FSE 2026
- Make Agent Defeat Agent: Automatic Detection of Taint-Style Vulnerabilities in LLM-based AgentsFengyu Liu, Yuan Zhang, Jiaqi Luo, Jiarun Dai et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Predecessor-aware Directed Greybox FuzzingYujian Zhang, Yaokun Liu, Jinyu Xu, Yanhao WangS&P 2024 · 8 citations
- TRIGFUZZ: Triggering Conditions Guided Directed FuzzingYiyang Chen, Nuoqi Gui, Long Wang, Longfei Chen et al.S&P 2026 · 1 citation
