Understanding Wikipedia Practices Through Hindi, Urdu, and English Takes on an Evolving Regional Conflict
Molly G. Hickman, Viral Pasad, Harsh Kamalesh Sanghavi, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Sang Won Lee
Abstract
Wikipedia is the product of thousands of editors working collaboratively to provide free and up-to-date encyclopedic information to the project's users. This article asks to what degree Wikipedia articles in three languages - Hindi, Urdu, and English - achieve Wikipedia's mission of making neutrally-presented, reliable information on a polarizing, controversial topic available to people around the globe. We chose the topic of the recent revocation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which, along with other recent events in and concerning the region of Jammu and Kashmir, has drawn attention to related articles on Wikipedia. This work focuses on the English Wikipedia, being the preeminent language edition of the project, as well as the Hindi and Urdu editions. Hindi and Urdu are the two standardized varieties of Hindustani, a lingua franca of Jammu and Kashmir. We analyzed page view and revision data for three Wikipedia articles to gauge popularity of the pages in our corpus, and responsiveness of editors to breaking news events and problematic edits. Additionally, we interviewed editors from all three language editions to learn about differences in editing processes and motivations, and we compared the text of the articles across languages as they appeared shortly after the revocation of Article 370. Across languages, we saw discrepancies in article tone, organization, and the information presented, as well as differences in how editors collaborate and communicate with one another. Nevertheless, in Hindi and Urdu, as well as English, editors predominantly try to adhere to the principle of neutral point of view (NPOV), and for the most part, the editors quash attempts by other editors to push political agendas.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6f5e285e-68f0-40ed-abe7-4088da2d02c1Cited by top-tier papers4
- Governance Capture in a Self-Governing Community: A Qualitative Comparison of the Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian, and Serbo-Croatian WikipediasZarine Kharazian, Kate Starbird, Benjamin Mako HillCSCW 2024 · 17 citations
- Wikipedia in Wartime: Experiences of Wikipedians Maintaining Articles About the Russia-Ukraine WarLaura Kurek, Ceren Budak, Eric GilbertCSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- Locating Information Gaps and Narrative Inconsistencies Across Languages: A Case Study of LGBT People Portrayals on WikipediaFarhan Samir, Chan Young Park, Anjalie Field, Vered Shwartz et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Beyond Access: Contextualizing the Benefits of Broadband through Contributor Dynamics on WikipediaYaxuan Yin, Jacob Thebault-SpiekerCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Quality Change: Norm or Exception? Measurement, Analysis and Detection of Quality Change in WikipediaParamita Das, Bhanu Prakash Reddy Guda, Sasi Bhushan Seelaboyina, Soumya Sarkar et al.CSCW 2022 · 8 citations
- Wikipedia Beyond the English Language Edition: How do Editors Collaborate in the Farsi and Chinese Wikipedias?Taryn Bipat, Negin Alimohammadi, Yihan Yu, David W. McDonald et al.CSCW 2021 · 3 citations
- How Good is Your Wikipedia? Auditing Data Quality for Low-resource and Multilingual NLPKushal Tatariya, Artur Kulmizev, Wessel Poelman, Esther Ploeger et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- An Open Multilingual System for Scoring Readability of WikipediaMykola Trokhymovych, Indira Sen, Martin GerlachACL 2024
- The social embeddedness of peer production: A comparative qualitative analysis of three Indian language Wikipedia editionsSejal Khatri, Aaron Shaw, Sayamindu Dasgupta, Benjamin Mako HillCHI 2022 · 8 citations
