Scaling can lead to compositional generalization
Florian Redhardt, Yassir Akram, Simon Schug
Abstract
Can neural networks systematically capture discrete, compositional task structure despite their continuous, distributed nature? The impressive capabilities of large-scale neural networks suggest that the answer to this question is yes. However, even for the most capable models, there are still frequent failure cases that raise doubts about their compositionality. Here, we seek to understand what it takes for a standard neural network to generalize over tasks that share compositional structure. We find that simply scaling data and model size leads to compositional generalization. We show that this holds across different task encodings as long as the training distribution sufficiently covers the task space. In line with this finding, we prove that standard multilayer perceptrons can approximate a general class of compositional task families to arbitrary precision using only a linear number of neurons with respect to the number of task modules. Finally, we uncover that if networks successfully compositionally generalize, the constituents of a task can be linearly decoded from their hidden activations. We show that this metric correlates with failures of text-to-image generation models to compose known concepts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6f4ec236-ec4d-44d9-a39f-3164cecb6d35Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on26
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image SynthesisPatrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari et al.ICML 2024 · 3,620 citations
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 728 citations
- The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"Lukas Berglund, Meg Tong, Maximilian Kaufmann, Mikita Balesni et al.ICLR 2024 · 462 citations
- Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language ModelsDenny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei et al.ICLR 2023 · 318 citations
Related papers
- Learning by Analogy: A Causal Framework for Compositional GeneralizationLingjing Kong, Shaoan Xie, Yang Jiao, Yetian Chen et al.CVPR 2026
- Break It Down: Evidence for Structural Compositionality in Neural NetworksMichael A. Lepori, Thomas Serre, Ellie PavlickNeurIPS 2023 · 66 citations
- Task Generalization with Autoregressive Compositional Structure: Can Learning from D Tasks Generalize to DT Tasks?Amirhesam Abedsoltan, Huaqing Zhang, Kaiyue Wen, Hongzhou Lin et al.ICML 2025
- On The Specialization of Neural ModulesDevon Jarvis, Richard Klein, Benjamin Rosman, Andrew M. SaxeICLR 2023 · 4 citations
- Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?Arnas Uselis, Andrea Dittadi, Seong Joon OhICML 2025
