Improving Adversarial Robust Fairness via Anti-Bias Soft Label Distillation
Shiji Zhao, Ranjie Duan, Xizhe Wang, Xingxing Wei
Abstract
Adversarial Training (AT) has been widely proved to be an effective method to improve the adversarial robustness against adversarial examples for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). As a variant of AT, Adversarial Robustness Distillation (ARD) has demonstrated its superior performance in improving the robustness of small student models with the guidance of large teacher models. However, both AT and ARD encounter the robust fairness problem: these models exhibit strong robustness when facing part of classes (easy class), but weak robustness when facing others (hard class). In this paper, we give an in-depth analysis of the potential factors and argue that the smoothness degree of samples' soft labels for different classes (i.e., hard class or easy class) will affect the robust fairness of DNNs from both empirical observation and theoretical analysis. Based on the above finding, we propose an Anti-Bias Soft Label Distillation (ABSLD) method to mitigate the adversarial robust fairness problem within the framework of Knowledge Distillation (KD). Specifically, ABSLD adaptively reduces the student's error risk gap between different classes to achieve fairness by adjusting the class-wise smoothness degree of samples' soft labels during the training process, and the smoothness degree of soft labels is controlled by assigning different temperatures in KD to different classes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ABSLD outperforms state-of-the-art AT, ARD, and robust fairness methods in the comprehensive metric (Normalized Standard Deviation) of robustness and fairness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6f15f674-4545-46ee-b9cf-d402029b9a88Cited by top-tier papers4
- Ciard: Cyclic Iterative Adversarial Robustness DistillationLiming Lu, Shuchao Pang, Xu Zheng, Xiang Gu et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Toward Understanding Adversarial Distillation: Why Robust Teachers FailHongsin Lee, Hye Won ChungICML 2026
- FERD: Fairness-Enhanced Data-Free Adversarial Robustness DistillationZhengxiao Li, Liming Lu, Xu Zheng, Si Yuan Liang et al.ICLR 2026
- Posterior Mismatch Matters: Adversarial Training for Long-Tailed RobustnessLilin Zhang, Li Yue, Jiancheng Shi, Jiancheng Lv et al.ICML 2026
Builds on17
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
- Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary AttackFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 597 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Adversarial Robustness Distillation: Robust Soft Labels Make Student BetterBojia Zi, Shihao Zhao, Xingjun Ma, Yu-Gang JiangICCV 2021 · 136 citations
- Revisiting Adversarial Robustness Distillation from the Perspective of Robust FairnessXinli Yue, Ningping Mou, Qian Wang, Lingchen ZhaoNeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
- Adversarially Robust DistillationMicah Goldblum, Liam Fowl, Soheil Feizi, Tom GoldsteinAAAI 2020 · 258 citations
- Reliable Adversarial Distillation with Unreliable TeachersJianing Zhu, Jiangchao Yao, Bo Han, Jingfeng Zhang et al.ICLR 2022 · 92 citations
- Annealing Self-Distillation Rectification Improves Adversarial TrainingYu-Yu Wu, Hung-Jui Wang, Shang-Tse ChenICLR 2024 · 10 citations
