Ciard: Cyclic Iterative Adversarial Robustness Distillation
Liming Lu, Shuchao Pang, Xu Zheng, Xiang Gu, Anan Du, Yunhuai Liu, Yongbin Zhou
Abstract
Adversarial robustness distillation (ARD) aims to transfer both performance and robustness from teacher model to lightweight student model, enabling resilient performance on resource-constrained scenarios. Though existing ARD approaches enhance student model's robustness, the inevitable by-product leads to the degraded performance on clean examples. We summarize the causes of this problem inherent in existing methods with dual-teacher framework as: 1 ⃝ The divergent optimization objectives of dualteacher models, i.e., the clean and robust teachers, impede effective knowledge transfer to the student model, and 2 ⃝ The iteratively generated adversarial examples during training lead to performance deterioration of the robust teacher model. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Cyclic Iterative ARD (CIARD) method with two key innovations: 1 ⃝ A multi-teacher framework with contrastive push-loss alignment to resolve conflicts in dualteacher optimization objectives, and 2 ⃝ Continuous adversarial retraining to maintain dynamic teacher robustness against performance degradation from the varying adversarial examples. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet demonstrate that CIARD achieves remarkable performance with an average 3.53% improvement in adversarial defense rates across various attack scenarios and a 5.87% increase in clean sample accuracy, establishing a new benchmark for balancing model robustness and generalization. Our code is available at https://github.com/eminentgu/CIARD.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 718b294f-b1f6-41db-8eed-5b1f86cdc21dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
- Adversarially Robust DistillationMicah Goldblum, Liam Fowl, Soheil Feizi, Tom GoldsteinAAAI 2020 · 258 citations
- From Knowledge Distillation to Self-Knowledge Distillation: A Unified Approach with Normalized Loss and Customized Soft LabelsZhendong Yang, Ailing Zeng, Zhe Li, Tianke Zhang et al.ICCV 2023 · 141 citations
Related papers
- PeerAiD: Improving Adversarial Distillation from a Specialized Peer TutorJaewon Jung, Hongsun Jang, Jaeyong Song, Jinho LeeCVPR 2024
- Exploring The Forgetting in Adversarial Training: A Novel Method for Enhancing RobustnessXianglu Wang, Hu DingICLR 2025
- Boosting Accuracy and Robustness of Student Models via Adaptive Adversarial DistillationBo Huang, Mingyang Chen, Yi Wang, Junda Lu et al.CVPR 2023
- Revisiting Adversarial Robustness Distillation from the Perspective of Robust FairnessXinli Yue, Ningping Mou, Qian Wang, Lingchen ZhaoNeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
- Out of Thin Air: Exploring Data-Free Adversarial Robustness DistillationYuzheng Wang, Zhaoyu Chen, Dingkang Yang, Pinxue Guo et al.AAAI 2024 · 14 citations
