ACL Findings2024
SLIDE: A Framework Integrating Small and Large Language Models for Open-Domain Dialogues Evaluation
Kun Zhao, Bohao Yang, Chen Tang, Chenghua Lin, Liang Zhan
Abstract
The long-standing one-to-many problem of gold standard responses in open-domain dialogue systems presents challenges for automatic evaluation metrics. Though prior works have demonstrated some success by applying powerful Large Language Models (LLMs), existing approaches still struggle with the oneto-many problem, and exhibit subpar performance in domain-specific scenarios. We assume the commonsense reasoning biases within LLMs may hinder their performance in domainspecific evaluations. To address both issues, we propose a novel framework SLIDE (Small and Large Integrated for Dialogue Evaluation), that leverages both a small, specialised model (SLM), and LLMs for the evaluation of open domain dialogues. Our approach introduces several techniques: (1) Contrastive learning to differentiate between robust and non-robust response embeddings; (2) A novel metric for semantic sensitivity that combines embedding cosine distances with similarity learned through neural networks, and (3) A strategy for incorporating the evaluation results from both the SLM and LLMs. Our empirical results demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in both the classification and evaluation tasks, and additionally the SLIDE evaluator exhibits better correlation with human judgements. Our code is available at https:// github.com/hegehongcha/SLIDE-ACL2024.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Builds on12
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 254 citations
- Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text GenerationMing Zhong, Yang Liu, Da Yin, Yuning Mao et al.EMNLP 2022 · 103 citations
Related papers
- Emphasising Structured Information: Integrating Abstract Meaning Representation into LLMs for Enhanced Open-Domain Dialogue EvaluationBohao Yang, Kun Zhao, Dong Liu, Chen Tang et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 citation
- DEnsity: Open-domain Dialogue Evaluation Metric using Density EstimationChaeHun Park, Seungil Chad Lee, Daniel Rim, Jaegul ChooACL Findings 2023 · 2 citations
- Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogues in Latent Space with Next Sentence Prediction and Mutual InformationKun Zhao, Bohao Yang, Chenghua Lin, Wenge Rong et al.ACL 2023 · 14 citations
- Don't Forget Your ABC's: Evaluating the State-of-the-Art in Chat-Oriented Dialogue SystemsSarah E. Finch, James D. Finch, Jinho D. ChoiACL 2023 · 10 citations
- Open-Domain Text Evaluation via Contrastive Distribution MethodsSidi Lu, Hongyi Liu, Asli Celikyilmaz, Tianlu Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 2 citations
