An Improved Analysis and Rates for Variance Reduction under Without-replacement Sampling Orders
Xinmeng Huang, Kun Yuan, Xianghui Mao, Wotao Yin
Abstract
When applying a stochastic algorithm, one must choose an order to draw samples. The practical choices are without-replacement sampling orders, which are empirically faster and more cache-friendly than uniform-iid-sampling but often have inferior theoretical guarantees. Without-replacement sampling is well understood only for SGD without variance reduction. In this paper, we will improve the convergence analysis and rates of variance reduction under without-replacement sampling orders for composite finite-sum minimization. Our results are in two-folds. First, we develop a damped variant of Finito called Prox-DFinito and establish its convergence rates with random reshuffling, cyclic sampling, and shuffling-once, under both convex and strongly convex scenarios. These rates match full-batch gradient descent and are state-of-the-art compared to the existing results for without-replacement sampling with variance-reduction. Second, our analysis can gauge how the cyclic order will influence the rate of cyclic sampling and, thus, allows us to derive the optimal fixed ordering. In the highly data-heterogeneous scenario, Prox-DFinito with optimal cyclic sampling can attain a sample-size-independent convergence rate, which, to our knowledge, is the first result that can match with uniform-iid-sampling with variance reduction. We also propose a practical method to discover the optimal cyclic ordering numerically.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6b6435bd-cf3b-46d7-8766-e6579103b1f7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Random Reshuffling: Simple Analysis with Vast ImprovementsKonstantin Mishchenko, Ahmed Khaled, Peter RichtárikNeurIPS 2020 · 172 citations
- Closing the convergence gap of SGD without replacementShashank Rajput, Anant Gupta, Dimitris S. PapailiopoulosICML 2020 · 73 citations
- Proximal and Federated Random ReshufflingKonstantin Mishchenko, Ahmed Khaled, Peter RichtárikICML 2022 · 39 citations
- Understanding the Impact of Model Incoherence on Convergence of Incremental SGD with Random ReshuffleShaocong Ma, Yi ZhouICML 2020 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Sampling without Replacement Leads to Faster Rates in Finite-Sum Minimax OptimizationAniket Das, Bernhard Schölkopf, Michael MuehlebachNeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- SGD with shuffling: optimal rates without component convexity and large epoch requirementsKwangjun Ahn, Chulhee Yun, Suvrit SraNeurIPS 2020 · 83 citations
- Demystifying SGD with Doubly Stochastic GradientsKyurae Kim, Joohwan Ko, Yian Ma, Jacob R. GardnerICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Tighter Lower Bounds for Shuffling SGD: Random Permutations and BeyondJaeyoung Cha, Jaewook Lee, Chulhee YunICML 2023 · 26 citations
- SGDA with shuffling: faster convergence for nonconvex-PŁ minimax optimizationHanseul Cho, Chulhee YunICLR 2023
