Lune

ICML2020Top-tier venue

Closing the convergence gap of SGD without replacement

Shashank Rajput, Anant Gupta, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos

2020Year
73Citations
36Top-tier citations

Abstract

Stochastic gradient descent without replacement sampling is widely used in practice for model training. However, the vast majority of SGD analyses assumes data is sampled with replacement, and when the function minimized is strongly convex, an O(1T)\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T}\right) rate can be established when SGD is run for TT iterations. A recent line of breakthrough works on SGD without replacement (SGDo) established an O(nT2)\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{n}{T^2}\right) convergence rate when the function minimized is strongly convex and is a sum of nn smooth functions, and an O(1T2+n3T3)\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T^2}+\frac{n^3}{T^3}\right) rate for sums of quadratics. On the other hand, the tightest known lower bound postulates an Ω(1T2+n2T3)\Omega\left(\frac{1}{T^2}+\frac{n^2}{T^3}\right) rate, leaving open the possibility of better SGDo convergence rates in the general case. In this paper, we close this gap and show that SGD without replacement achieves a rate of O(1T2+n2T3)\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T^2}+\frac{n^2}{T^3}\right) when the sum of the functions is a quadratic, and offer a new lower bound of Ω(nT2)\Omega\left(\frac{n}{T^2}\right) for strongly convex functions that are sums of smooth functions.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 8e7df76f-10e4-43d1-9198-eab768bae4fc

Cited by top-tier papers36

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines