High-Dimensional Dueling Optimization with Preference Embedding
Yangwenhui Zhang, Hong Qian, Xiang Shu, Aimin Zhou
Abstract
In many scenarios of black-box optimization, evaluating the objective function values of solutions is expensive, while comparing a pair of solutions is relatively cheap, which yields the dueling black-box optimization. The side effect of dueling optimization is that it doubles the dimension of solution space and exacerbates the dimensionality scalability issue of black-box optimization, e.g., Bayesian optimization. To address this issue, the existing dueling optimization methods fix one solution when dueling throughout the optimization process, but it may reduce their efficacy. Fortunately, it has been observed that, in recommendation systems, the dueling results are mainly determined by the latent human preferences. In this paper, we abstract this phenomenon as the preferential intrinsic dimension and inject it into the dueling Bayesian optimization, resulting in the preferential embedding dueling Bayesian optimization (PE-DBO). PE-DBO decouples optimization and pairwise comparison via the preferential embedding matrix. Optimization is performed in the preferential intrinsic subspace with much lower dimensionality, while pairwise comparison is completed in the original dueling solution space. Theoretically, we disclose that the preference function can be approximately preserved in the lower-dimensional preferential intrinsic subspace. Experiment results verify that, on molecule discovery and web page recommendation dueling optimization tasks, the preferential intrinsic dimension exists and PE-DBO is superior in scalability compared with that of the state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6b1e7f88-dfd5-4c49-96a3-ce903eb28ed7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian OptimizationMaximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel R. Jiang, Samuel Daulton et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 686 citations
- Monte Carlo Tree Search based Variable Selection for High Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationLei Song, Ke Xue, Xiaobin Huang, Chao QianNeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
- Projective Preferential Bayesian OptimizationPetrus Mikkola, Milica Todorovic, Jari Järvi, Patrick Rinke et al.ICML 2020 · 24 citations
- Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-TuningArmen Aghajanyan, Sonal Gupta, Luke ZettlemoyerACL 2021
Related papers
- Towards Practical Preferential Bayesian Optimization with Skew Gaussian ProcessesShion Takeno, Masahiro Nomura, Masayuki KarasuyamaICML 2023 · 26 citations
- Re-Examining Linear Embeddings for High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationBenjamin Letham, Roberto Calandra, Akshara Rai, Eytan BakshyNeurIPS 2020 · 152 citations
- Trading Convergence Rate with Computational Budget in High Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationHung Tran-The, Sunil Gupta, Santu Rana, Svetha VenkateshAAAI 2020 · 14 citations
- BOIDS: High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Incumbent-Guided Direction Lines and Subspace EmbeddingsLam Ngo, Huong Ha, Jeffrey Chan, Hongyu ZhangAAAI 2025
- Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent SpaceKazuki Ishikawa, Ryota Ozaki, Yohei Kanzaki, Ichiro Takeuchi et al.KDD 2025 · 1 citation
