Trading Convergence Rate with Computational Budget in High Dimensional Bayesian Optimization
Hung Tran-The, Sunil Gupta, Santu Rana, Svetha Venkatesh
Abstract
Scaling Bayesian optimisation (BO) to high-dimensional search spaces is a active and open research problems particularly when no assumptions are made on function structure. The main reason is that at each iteration, BO requires to find global maximisation of acquisition function, which itself is a non-convex optimization problem in the original search space. With growing dimensions, the computational budget for this maximisation gets increasingly short leading to inaccurate solution of the maximisation. This inaccuracy adversely affects both the convergence and the efficiency of BO. We propose a novel approach where the acquisition function only requires maximisation on a discrete set of low dimensional subspaces embedded in the original highdimensional search space. Our method is free of any low dimensional structure assumption on the function unlike many recent high-dimensional BO methods. Optimising acquisition function in low dimensional subspaces allows our method to obtain accurate solutions within limited computational budget. We show that in spite of this convenience, our algorithm remains convergent. In particular, cumulative regret of our algorithm only grows sub-linearly with the number of iterations. More importantly, as evident from our regret bounds, our algorithm provides a way to trade the convergence rate with the number of subspaces used in the optimisation. Finally, when the number of subspaces is "sufficiently large", our algorithm's cumulative regret is at most O * ( √ T γT ) as opposed to O * ( √ DT γT ) for the GP-UCB of Srinivas et al. ( 2012 ), reducing a crucial factor √ D where D being the dimensional number of input space. We perform empirical experiments to evaluate our method extensively, showing that its sample efficiency is better than the existing methods for many optimisation problems involving dimensions up to 5000.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3db1ed52-a990-47ed-bd7b-dcae9d548c9bCited by top-tier papers4
- Relaxing the Additivity Constraints in Decentralized No-Regret High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationAnthony Bardou, Patrick Thiran, Thomas BeginICLR 2024 · 10 citations
- Sub-linear Regret Bounds for Bayesian Optimisation in Unknown Search SpacesHung Tran-The, Sunil Gupta, Santu Rana, Huong Ha et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 8 citations
- Regional Expected Improvement for Efficient Trust Region Selection in High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationNobuo Namura, Sho TakemoriAAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- Bayesian Optimistic Optimisation with Exponentially Decaying RegretHung Tran-The, Sunil Gupta, Santu Rana, Svetha VenkateshICML 2021 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Re-Examining Linear Embeddings for High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationBenjamin Letham, Roberto Calandra, Akshara Rai, Eytan BakshyNeurIPS 2020 · 152 citations
- BOIDS: High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Incumbent-Guided Direction Lines and Subspace EmbeddingsLam Ngo, Huong Ha, Jeffrey Chan, Hongyu ZhangAAAI 2025
- High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Nested Riemannian ManifoldsNoémie Jaquier, Leonel Dario RozoNeurIPS 2020 · 33 citations
- High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Tree-Structured Additive ModelsEric Han, Ishank Arora, Jonathan ScarlettAAAI 2021 · 26 citations
- Experimental Design for Optimization of Orthogonal Projection Pursuit ModelsMojmir Mutny, Johannes Kirschner, Andreas KrauseAAAI 2020 · 8 citations
