DAComp: Benchmarking Data Agents across the Full Data Intelligence Lifecycle
Fangyu Lei, Jinxiang Meng, Yiming Huang, Junjie zhao, Yitong Zhang, Jianwen Luo, Xin Zou, Ruiyi Yang, Wenbo Shi, Yan Gao, Shizhu He, Jun Zhao
Abstract
Real-world enterprise data intelligence workflows encompass data engineering that turns raw sources into analytical-ready tables and data analysis that convert those tables into decision-oriented insights. We introduce DAComp, a benchmark of 210 tasks that mirrors these complex workflows. Data engineering (DE) tasks require repository-level engineering on industrial schemas, including designing and building multi-stage SQL pipelines from scratch and evolving existing systems under evolving requirements. Data analysis (DA) tasks pose open-ended business problems that demand strategic planning, exploratory analysis through iterative coding, interpretation of intermediate results, and the synthesis of actionable recommendations. Engineering tasks are scored through execution-based, multi-metric evaluation. Open-ended tasks are assessed by a reliable, experimentally validated LLM-judge, which is guided by hierarchical, meticulously crafted rubrics. Our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art agents falter on DAComp. Performance on DE tasks is particularly low, with success rates under 20%, exposing a critical bottleneck in holistic pipeline orchestration, not merely code generation. Scores on DA tasks also average below 40%, highlighting profound deficiencies in open-ended reasoning and demonstrating that engineering and analysis are distinct capabilities. By clearly diagnosing these limitations, DAComp provides a rigorous and realistic testbed to drive the development of truly capable autonomous data agents for enterprise settings. Our data and code are available at da-comp.github.io.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6af3bb7f-bad3-4fb5-932b-e2758d6ad1d6Cited by top-tier papers2
- AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World EnvironmentsZhiheng Xi, Dingwen Yang, Jiaqi Liu, Jixuan Huang et al.ACL 2026
- TaREx: Reinforcement Learning for Code-Driven Table ReasoningFangyu Lei, Jinxiang Meng, Yiming Huang, Shizhu He et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on13
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
- DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research AgentsMingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Licheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 250 citations
- InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis TasksXueyu Hu, Ziyu Zhao, Shuang Wei, Ziwei Chai et al.ICML 2024 · 110 citations
- VisJudge-Bench: Aesthetics and Quality Assessment of VisualizationsYupeng Xie, Zhiyang Zhang, Yifan Wu, Sirong Lu et al.ICLR 2026 · 23 citations
Related papers
- DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?Liqiang Jing, Zhehui Huang, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao et al.ICLR 2025
- DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsYiming Huang, Jianwen Luo, Yan Yu, Yitong Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
- Hunt Instead of Wait: Evaluating Deep Data Research on Large Language ModelsWei Liu, Peijie Yu, Michele Orini, Yali Du et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- ELT-Bench: An End-to-End Benchmark for Evaluating AI Agents on ELT PipelinesTengjun Jin, Yuxuan Zhu, Daniel KangVLDB 2026 · 13 citations
- CoDA-Bench: Can Code Agents Handle Data-Intensive Tasks?Yuxin Zhang, Ju Fan, Meihao Fan, Shaolei Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
