CoDA-Bench: Can Code Agents Handle Data-Intensive Tasks?
Yuxin Zhang, Ju Fan, Meihao Fan, Shaolei Zhang, Xiaoyong Du
Abstract
Advanced agents are increasingly demonstrating the potential to operate as autonomous engineers, creating a growing demand for evaluation benchmarks that capture the complexity of real-world development. Such environments typically involve both complex code and large-scale data (i.e., file system). However, existing benchmarks usually evaluate code-centric or data-centric capabilities in isolation, leaving a clear gap with real development scenarios. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing CODA-BENCH, the first benchmark to jointly evaluate code and data intelligence in a data-intensive environment. We construct a data-intensive Linux sandbox based on the Kaggle ecosystem (containing hundreds of datasets), where agents must actively explore complex file hierarchies to identify relevant resources and generate code for data-driven analytical tasks. CODA-BENCH comprises 1,009 tasks spanning 31 communities, with each task environment containing an average of 980 files, simulating realistic data scale and noise. Evaluations of advanced agents reveal that even top-performing systems struggle to effectively integrate data discovery with code execution, achieving a success rate of only 61.1%. These results highlight a substantial gap in current agentic capabilities for dataintensive tasks and point to promising directions for future research * .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6893f1c8-4e62-4914-bc8c-9d5ca4b22b09Builds on27
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous AgentsShuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,197 citations
Related papers
- DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?Liqiang Jing, Zhehui Huang, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao et al.ICLR 2025
- KRAMABENCH: A Benchmark for AI Systems on Data-to-Insight Pipelines over Data LakesEugenie Lai, Gerardo Vitagliano, Ziyu Zhang, Om Chabra et al.ICLR 2026 · 37 citations
- DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsYiming Huang, Jianwen Luo, Yan Yu, Yitong Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
- NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding AgentsJingzhe Ding, Shengda Long, Changxin Pu, Ge Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 37 citations
- KoCo-Bench: Can Large Language Models Leverage Domain Knowledge in Software Development?Xue Jiang, Ge Li, Jiaru Qian, Xianjie Shi et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
