Capturing Semantics for Imputation with Pre-trained Language Models
Yinan Mei, Shaoxu Song, Chenguang Fang, Haifeng Yang, Jingyun Fang, Jiang Long
Abstract
Existing imputation methods generally generate several possible fillings as candidates and determine the value from the candidates for imputing. However, semantics are ignored in these methods. Recently, pre-trained language models achieve good performances in various language understanding tasks. Motivated by this, we propose IPM that captures semantics for Imputation with Pre-trained language Models. A straightforward idea is to model the imputation task as a multiclass classfication task, named IPM-Multi. IPM-Multi predicts the missing values by fine-tuning the pre-trained model. Due to the low redundancy of databases and large domain sizes, IPM-Multi may suffer the over-fitting problem. In this case, we develop another approach named IPM-Binary. IPM-Binary first generates a set of uncertain candidates and fine-tunes a pre-trained language model to select candidates. Specifically, IPM-Binary models the candidate selection task as a binary classification problem. Unlike IPM-Multi, IPM-Binary computes the probability for each candidate filling respectively, by accepting both complete attributes and a candidate filling as input. The attention mechanism enhances the ability of IPM-Binary to capture semantic information. Moreover, negative sampling from neighbors rather than domains is employed to accelerate the training process and makes the training more targeted and effective. As a result, IPM-Binary requires fewer data to converge. We compare our proposal IPM to the state-of-the-art baselines on multiple datasets. And the extensive experimental results show that IPM outperforms existing solutions. The evaluation of IPM validates our intuitions and demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed optimizations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers9
- Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?Avanika Narayan, Ines Chami, Laurel J. Orr, Christopher RéVLDB 2023 · 325 citations
- Is In-Context Learning in Large Language Models Bayesian? A Martingale PerspectiveFabian Falck, Ziyu Wang, Christopher C. HolmesICML 2024 · 46 citations
- On LLM-Enhanced Mixed-Type Data Imputation with High-Order Message PassingJianmin Wang, Kai Wang, Ying Zhang, Wenjie Zhang et al.VLDB 2025 · 15 citations
- Unveiling Challenges for LLMs in Enterprise Data EngineeringJan-Micha Bodensohn, Ulf Brackmann, Liane Vogel, Anupam Sanghi et al.VLDB 2026 · 13 citations
- Jellyfish: Instruction-Tuning Local Large Language Models for Data PreprocessingHaochen Zhang, Yuyang Dong, Chuan Xiao, Masafumi OyamadaEMNLP 2024 · 11 citations
Builds on3
- Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language ModelsYuliang Li, Jinfeng Li, Yoshihiko Suhara, AnHai Doan et al.VLDB 2021 · 484 citations
- Creating Embeddings of Heterogeneous Relational Datasets for Data Integration TasksRiccardo Cappuzzo, Paolo Papotti, Saravanan ThirumuruganathanSIGMOD 2020 · 139 citations
- Imputing Various Incomplete Attributes via Distance Likelihood MaximizationShaoxu Song, Yu SunKDD 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- EXOTIC: External Vision-driven Incomplete Multi-view ClassificationShilin Xu, Dezhong Peng, Zhenwen Ren, Yuan SunCVPR 2026
- Characterizing the Predictive Impact of Modalities with Supervised Latent-Variable ModelingDivyam Madaan, Sumit Chopra, Kyunghyun ChoICML 2026
- Rare Words: A Major Problem for Contextualized Embeddings and How to Fix it by Attentive MimickingTimo Schick, Hinrich SchützeAAAI 2020 · 106 citations
- Zero-Shot Slot Filling with Slot-Prefix Prompting and Attention Relationship DescriptorQiaoyang Luo, Lingqiao LiuAAAI 2023 · 10 citations
- Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPFeng Liang, Bichen Wu, Xiaoliang Dai, Kunpeng Li et al.CVPR 2023
