Jellyfish: Instruction-Tuning Local Large Language Models for Data Preprocessing
Haochen Zhang, Yuyang Dong, Chuan Xiao, Masafumi Oyamada
Abstract
This paper explores the utilization of LLMs for data preprocessing (DP), a crucial step in the data mining pipeline that transforms raw data into a clean format conducive to easy processing. Whereas the use of LLMs has sparked interest in devising universal solutions to DP, recent initiatives in this domain typically rely on GPT APIs, raising inevitable data breach concerns. Unlike these approaches, we consider instruction-tuning local LLMs (7 -13B models) as universal DP task solvers that operate on a local, single, and low-priced GPU, ensuring data security and enabling further customization. We select a collection of datasets across four representative DP tasks and construct instruction tuning data using data configuration, knowledge injection, and reasoning data distillation techniques tailored to DP. By tuning Mistral-7B, Llama 3-8B, and OpenOrca-Platypus2-13B, our models, namely, Jellyfish-7B/8B/13B, deliver competitiveness compared to GPT-3.5/4 models and strong generalizability to unseen tasks while barely compromising the base models' abilities in NLP tasks. Meanwhile, Jellyfish offers enhanced reasoning capabilities compared to GPT-3.5.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- On LLM-Enhanced Mixed-Type Data Imputation with High-Order Message PassingJianmin Wang, Kai Wang, Ying Zhang, Wenjie Zhang et al.VLDB 2025 · 15 citations
- QUEST: Query Optimization in Unstructured Document AnalysisZhaoze Sun, Chengliang Chai, Qiyan Deng, Kaisen Jin et al.VLDB 2025 · 9 citations
- Empowering Tabular Data Preparation with Language Models: Why and How?Mengshi Chen, Yuxiang Sun, Tengchao Li, Jianwei Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- BEACON: Budget-Aware Entity Matching Across DomainsNicholas Pulsone, Roee Shraga, Gregory GorenSIGMOD 2026 · 2 citations
- Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language ModelsYurong Liu, Yeye He, Haoyu Dong, Junjie Xing et al.VLDB 2026
Builds on22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
Related papers
- KnowTrans: Boosting Transferability of Data Preparation LLMs via Knowledge AugmentationYuhang Ge, Fengyu Li, Yuren Mao, Yanbo Yang et al.ICDE 2025
- MAmmoTH2: Scaling Instructions from the WebXiang Yue, Tianyu Zheng, Ge Zhang, Wenhu ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 176 citations
- Efficient Mixture of Experts based on Large Language Models for Low-Resource Data PreprocessingMengyi Yan, Yaoshu Wang, Kehan Pang, Min Xie et al.KDD 2024 · 9 citations
- LLM-AutoDP: Automatic Data Processing via LLM Agents for Model Fine-tuningWei Huang, Anda Cheng, Yinggui Wang, Lei Wang et al.VLDB 2026 · 1 citation
- Making Large Language Models Better Data CreatorsDong-Ho Lee, Jay Pujara, Mohit Sewak, Ryen White et al.EMNLP 2023 · 13 citations
