Stolen Risks of Models with Security Properties
Yue Qin, Zhuoqun Fu, Chuyun Deng, Xiaojing Liao, Jia Zhang, Haixin Duan
Abstract
Verifiable robust machine learning, as a new trend of ML security defense, enforces security properties (e.g., Lipschitzness, Monotonicity) on machine learning models and achieves satisfying accuracysecurity trade-off. Such security properties identify a series of evasion strategies of ML security attackers and specify logical constraints on their effects on a classifier (e.g., the classifier is monotonically increasing along some feature dimensions). However, little has been done so far to understand the side effect of those security properties on the model privacy. In this paper, we aim at better understanding the privacy impacts on security properties of robust ML models. Particularly, we report the first measurement study to investigate the model stolen risks of robust models satisfying four security properties (i.e., LocalInvariance, Lipschitzness, SmallNeighborhood, and Monotonicity). Our findings bring to light the factors that influence model stealing attacks and defense performance on models trained with security properties. In addition, to train an ML model satisfying goals in accuracy, security, and privacy, we propose a novel technique, called BoundaryFuzz, which introduces a privacy property into verifiable robust training frameworks to defend against model stealing attacks on robust models. Experimental results demonstrate the defense effectiveness of BoundaryFuzz.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on19
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
- Label-Only Membership Inference AttacksChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Florian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas PapernotICML 2021 · 628 citations
Related papers
- Extracting Robust Models with Uncertain ExamplesGuanlin Li, Guowen Xu, Shangwei Guo, Han Qiu et al.ICLR 2023
- Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial ExamplesLiwei Song, Reza Shokri, Prateek MittalCCS 2019 · 293 citations
- TransLinkGuard: Safeguarding Transformer Models Against Model Stealing in Edge DeploymentQinfeng Li, Zhiqiang Shen, Zhenghan Qin, Yangfan Xie et al.ACM MM 2024 · 9 citations
- Please Tell Me More: Privacy Impact of Explainability through the Lens of Membership Inference AttackHan Liu, Yuhao Wu, Zhiyuan Yu, Ning ZhangS&P 2024 · 52 citations
- Learning Security Classifiers with Verified Global Robustness PropertiesYizheng Chen, Shiqi Wang, Yue Qin, Xiaojing Liao et al.CCS 2021 · 26 citations
