PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance Evaluation
Yu Yang, Ig-Jae Kim, Dongwook Yoon
Abstract
AI compliance is becoming increasingly critical as AI systems grow more powerful and pervasive. Yet the rapid expansion of AI policies creates substantial burdens for resource-constrained practitioners lacking policy expertise. Existing approaches typically address one policy at a time, making multi-policy compliance costly. We present PASTA, a scalable compliance tool integrating four innovations: (1) a comprehensive model-card format supporting descriptive inputs across development stages; (2) a policy normalization scheme ; (3) an efficient LLM-powered pairwise evaluation engine with cost-saving strategies; and (4) an interface delivering interpretable evaluations via compliance heatmaps and actionable recommendations. Expert evaluation shows PASTA's judgments closely align with human experts (𝜌 ≥ .626). The system evaluates five major policies in under two minutes at approximately $3. A user study (N = 12) confirms practitioners found outputs easy-to-understand and actionable, introducing a novel framework for scalable automated AI governance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6a4e24d5-5734-470c-bffa-b811a386f520Builds on7
- Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application PrototypingZijie J. Wang, Chinmay Kulkarni, Lauren Wilcox, Michael Terry et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
- The Situate AI Guidebook: Co-Designing a Toolkit to Support Multi-Stakeholder, Early-stage Deliberations Around Public Sector AI ProposalsAnna Kawakami, Amanda Coston, Haiyi Zhu, Hoda Heidari et al.CHI 2024 · 54 citations
- Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit ToolingVictor Ojewale, Ryan Steed, Briana Vecchione, Abeba Birhane et al.CHI 2025 · 46 citations
- RAI Guidelines: Method for Generating Responsible AI Guidelines Grounded in Regulations and Usable by (Non-)Technical RolesMarios Constantinides, Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Daniele Quercia, Susanna Kallio et al.CSCW 2024 · 28 citations
- RiskRAG: A Data-Driven Solution for Improved AI Model Risk ReportingPooja S. B. Rao, Sanja Scepanovic, Ke Zhou, Edyta Paulina Bogucka et al.CHI 2025 · 7 citations
Related papers
- COMPASS: A Framework for Evaluating Organization-Specific Policy Alignment in LLMsDasol Choi, DongGeon Lee, Brigitta Jesica Kartono, Helena Berndt et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM PoliciesK. J. Kevin Feng, Tzu-Sheng Kuo, Quan Ze Jim Chen, Inyoung Cheong et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Licoeval: Evaluating LLMs on License Compliance in Code GenerationWeiwei Xu, Kai Gao, Hao He, Minghui ZhouICSE 2025 · 6 citations
- Privy: Envisioning and Mitigating Privacy Risks for Consumer-facing AI Product ConceptsHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Yu-Ju Yang, Matthew Bilik, Isadora Krsek et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- LLM Comparator: Interactive Analysis of Side-by-Side Evaluation of Large Language ModelsMinsuk Kahng, Ian Tenney, Mahima Pushkarna, Michael Xieyang Liu et al.IEEE VIS 2024 · 23 citations
