BCD Nets: Scalable Variational Approaches for Bayesian Causal Discovery
Chris Cundy, Aditya Grover, Stefano Ermon
Abstract
A structural equation model (SEM) is an effective framework to reason over causal relationships represented via a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Recent advances have enabled effective maximum-likelihood point estimation of DAGs from observational data. However, a point estimate may not accurately capture the uncertainty in inferring the underlying graph in practical scenarios, wherein the true DAG is non-identifiable and/or the observed dataset is limited. We propose Bayesian Causal Discovery Nets (BCD Nets), a variational inference framework for estimating a distribution over DAGs characterizing a linear-Gaussian SEM. Developing a full Bayesian posterior over DAGs is challenging due to the the discrete and combinatorial nature of graphs. We analyse key design choices for scalable VI over DAGs, such as 1) the parametrization of DAGs via an expressive variational family, 2) a continuous relaxation that enables low-variance stochastic optimization, and 3) suitable priors over the latent variables. We provide a series of experiments on real and synthetic data showing that BCD Nets outperform maximum-likelihood methods on standard causal discovery metrics such as structural Hamming distance in low data regimes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6975e339-e75c-48c0-9d23-7b8188da1b58Cited by top-tier papers22
- Interventions, Where and How? Experimental Design for Causal Models at ScalePanagiotis Tigas, Yashas Annadani, Andrew Jesson, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 68 citations
- Joint Bayesian Inference of Graphical Structure and Parameters with a Single Generative Flow NetworkTristan Deleu, Mizu Nishikawa-Toomey, Jithendaraa Subramanian, Nikolay Malkin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 66 citations
- CUTS+: High-Dimensional Causal Discovery from Irregular Time-SeriesYuxiao Cheng, Lianglong Li, Tingxiong Xiao, Zongren Li et al.AAAI 2024 · 58 citations
- BayesDAG: Gradient-Based Posterior Inference for Causal DiscoveryYashas Annadani, Nick Pawlowski, Joel Jennings, Stefan Bauer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 54 citations
- Active Bayesian Causal InferenceChristian Toth, Lars Lorch, Christian Knoll, Andreas Krause et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
Builds on5
- AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed GradientsJuntang Zhuang, Tommy Tang, Yifan Ding, Sekhar Tatikonda et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 697 citations
- On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGsIgnavier Ng, AmirEmad Ghassami, Kun ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 306 citations
- Relaxing Bijectivity Constraints with Continuously Indexed Normalising FlowsRobert Cornish, Anthony L. Caterini, George Deligiannidis, Arnaud DoucetICML 2020 · 141 citations
- DAGs with No Fears: A Closer Look at Continuous Optimization for Learning Bayesian NetworksDennis Wei, Tian Gao, Yue YuNeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
- Towards Scalable Bayesian Learning of Causal DAGsJussi Viinikka, Antti Hyttinen, Johan Pensar, Mikko KoivistoNeurIPS 2020 · 49 citations
Related papers
- ProDAG: Projected Variational Inference for Directed Acyclic GraphsRyan Thompson, Edwin V. Bonilla, Robert KohnNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Learning Large DAGs by Combining Continuous Optimization and Feedback Arc Set HeuristicsPierre Gillot, Pekka ParviainenAAAI 2022 · 5 citations
- DiBS: Differentiable Bayesian Structure LearningLars Lorch, Jonas Rothfuss, Bernhard Schölkopf, Andreas KrauseNeurIPS 2021 · 144 citations
- Nonlinear Causal Discovery with Latent ConfoundersDavid Kaltenpoth, Jilles VreekenICML 2023 · 22 citations
- Directed Cyclic Graph for Causal Discovery from Multivariate Functional DataSaptarshi Roy, Raymond K. W. Wong, Yang NiNeurIPS 2023 · 10 citations
