"Merging Results Is No Easy Task": An International Survey Study of Collaborative Data Analysis Practices Among UX Practitioners
Emily Kuang, Xiaofu Jin, Mingming Fan
Abstract
Analysis is a key part of usability testing where UX practitioners seek to identify usability problems and generate redesign suggestions. Although previous research reported how analysis was conducted, the findings were typically focused on individual analysis or based on a small number of professionals in specific geographic regions. We conducted an online international survey of 279 UX practitioners on their practices and challenges while collaborating during data analysis. We found that UX practitioners were often under time pressure to conduct analysis and adopted three modes of collaboration: independently analyze different portions of the data and then collaborate, collaboratively analyze the session with little or no independent analysis, and independently analyze the same set of data and then collaborate. Moreover, most encountered challenges related to lack of resources, disagreements with colleagues regarding usability problems, and difficulty merging analysis from multiple practitioners. We discuss design implications to better support collaborative data analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 696aa9c3-81ce-47cb-8fcc-feb1232e3b22Cited by top-tier papers6
- Enhancing UX Evaluation Through Collaboration with Conversational AI Assistants: Effects of Proactive Dialogue and TimingEmily Kuang, Minghao Li, Mingming Fan, Kristen ShinoharaCHI 2024 · 47 citations
- Understanding Collaborative Practices and Tools of Professional UX Practitioners in Software OrganizationsK. J. Kevin Feng, Tony W. Li, Amy X. ZhangCHI 2023 · 42 citations
- Collaboration with Conversational AI Assistants for UX Evaluation: Questions and How to Ask them (Voice vs. Text)Emily Kuang, Ehsan Jahangirzadeh Soure, Mingming Fan, Jian Zhao et al.CHI 2023 · 42 citations
- Identifying the Barriers to Human-Centered Design in the Workplace: Perspectives from UX ProfessionalsTim GorichanazCSCW 2025 · 6 citations
- "It Became My Buddy, But I'm Not Afraid to Disagree": A Multi-Session Study of UX Evaluators Collaborating with Conversational AI AssistantsEmily Kuang, Ehsan Jahangirzadeh Soure, Luyao Shen, Nitesh Goyal et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on3
- Heuristic Evaluation of Conversational AgentsRaina Langevin, Ross J. Lordon, Thi Avrahami, Benjamin R. Cowan et al.CHI 2021 · 159 citations
- CoUX: Collaborative Visual Analysis of Think-Aloud Usability Test Videos for Digital InterfacesEhsan Jahangirzadeh Soure, Emily Kuang, Mingming Fan, Jian ZhaoIEEE VIS 2021 · 33 citations
- Older Adults' Think-Aloud Verbalizations and Speech Features for Identifying User Experience ProblemsMingming Fan, Qiwen Zhao, Vinita TibdewalCHI 2021 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Challenges and Opportunities for Tool Adoption in Industrial UX Research CollaborationsDaye Kang, Jeffrey M. RzeszotarskiCSCW 2024 · 1 citation
- Analyzing Collaborative Challenges and Needs of UX Practitioners when Designing with AI/MLMeena Devii Muralikumar, David W. McDonaldCSCW 2024 · 6 citations
- Dimensions of UX Practice that Shape Ethical AwarenessShruthi Sai Chivukula, Chris Rhys Watkins, Rhea Manocha, Jingle Chen et al.CHI 2020 · 58 citations
- Human-AI Collaboration for UX Evaluation: Effects of Explanation and SynchronizationMingming Fan, Xianyou Yang, Tsz Tung Yu, Vera Q. Liao et al.CSCW 2022 · 80 citations
- Who is to Blame: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Designer-Developer CollaborationShutong Zhang, Tianyu Zhang, Jinghui Cheng, Shurui ZhouCSCW 2025 · 6 citations
