CoUX: Collaborative Visual Analysis of Think-Aloud Usability Test Videos for Digital Interfaces
Ehsan Jahangirzadeh Soure, Emily Kuang, Mingming Fan, Jian Zhao
Abstract
Reviewing a think-aloud video is both time-consuming and demanding as it requires UX (user experience) professionals to attend to many behavioral signals of the user in the video. Moreover, challenges arise when multiple UX professionals need to collaborate to reduce bias and errors. We propose a collaborative visual analytics tool, CoUX, to facilitate UX evaluators collectively reviewing think-aloud usability test videos of digital interfaces. CoUX seamlessly supports usability problem identification, annotation, and discussion in an integrated environment. To ease the discovery of usability problems, CoUX visualizes a set of problem-indicators based on acoustic, textual, and visual features extracted from the video and audio of a think-aloud session with machine learning. CoUX further enables collaboration amongst UX evaluators for logging, commenting, and consolidating the discovered problems with a chatbox-like user interface. We designed CoUX based on a formative study with two UX experts and insights derived from the literature. We conducted a user study with six pairs of UX practitioners on collaborative think-aloud video analysis tasks. The results indicate that CoUX is useful and effective in facilitating both problem identification and collaborative teamwork. We provide insights into how different features of CoUX were used to support both independent analysis and collaboration. Furthermore, our work highlights opportunities to improve collaborative usability test video analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers12
- Human-AI Collaboration for UX Evaluation: Effects of Explanation and SynchronizationMingming Fan, Xianyou Yang, Tsz Tung Yu, Vera Q. Liao et al.CSCW 2022 · 80 citations
- Enhancing UX Evaluation Through Collaboration with Conversational AI Assistants: Effects of Proactive Dialogue and TimingEmily Kuang, Minghao Li, Mingming Fan, Kristen ShinoharaCHI 2024 · 47 citations
- Collaboration with Conversational AI Assistants for UX Evaluation: Questions and How to Ask them (Voice vs. Text)Emily Kuang, Ehsan Jahangirzadeh Soure, Mingming Fan, Jian Zhao et al.CHI 2023 · 42 citations
- VideoModerator: A Risk-aware Framework for Multimodal Video Moderation in E-CommerceTan Tang, Yanhong Wu, Yingcai Wu, Lingyun Yu et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 31 citations
- ReVISit 2: A Full Experiment Life Cycle User Study FrameworkZach Cutler, Jack Wilburn, Hilson Shrestha, Yiren Ding et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 25 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- "Merging Results Is No Easy Task": An International Survey Study of Collaborative Data Analysis Practices Among UX PractitionersEmily Kuang, Xiaofu Jin, Mingming FanCHI 2022 · 13 citations
- Challenges and Opportunities for Tool Adoption in Industrial UX Research CollaborationsDaye Kang, Jeffrey M. RzeszotarskiCSCW 2024 · 1 citation
- Crowdsourced Think-Aloud StudiesZach Cutler, Lane Harrison, Carolina Nobre, Alexander LexCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- "It Became My Buddy, But I'm Not Afraid to Disagree": A Multi-Session Study of UX Evaluators Collaborating with Conversational AI AssistantsEmily Kuang, Ehsan Jahangirzadeh Soure, Luyao Shen, Nitesh Goyal et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Comparing Native and Non-native English Speakers' Behaviors in Collaborative Writing through Visual AnalyticsYuexi Chen, Yimin Xiao, Kazi Tasnim Zinat, Naomi Yamashita et al.CHI 2025 · 2 citations
