FreshBrew: A Benchmark for Evaluating AI Agents on Java Code Migration
Victor May, Diganta Misra, Yanqi Luo, Anjali Sridhar, Justine Gehring, Silvio Soares Ribeiro
Abstract
AI coding assistants are rapidly becoming integral to modern software development. A key challenge in this space is the continual need to migrate and modernize codebases in response to evolving software ecosystems. Traditionally, such migrations have relied on rule-based systems and human intervention. With the advent of powerful large language models (LLMs), AI-driven agentic frameworks offer a promising alternative-but their effectiveness has not been systematically evaluated. In this paper, we introduce FreshBrew 1 , a novel benchmark for evaluating AI agents on project-level Java migrations, with a specific focus on measuring an agent's ability to preserve program semantics and avoid reward hacking, which we argue requires projects with high test coverage for a rigorous and reliable evaluation. We benchmark several state-of-the-art LLMs, and compare their performance against established rule-based tools. Our evaluation of AI agents on this benchmark of 228 repositories shows that the top-performing model, Gemini 2.5 Flash, can successfully migrate 52.3% of projects to JDK 17. Our empirical analysis reveals novel insights into the critical strengths and limitations of current agentic approaches, offering actionable insights into their real-world applicability. Our empirical study reveals failure modes of current AI agents in realistic Java modernization tasks, providing a foundation for evaluating trustworthy code-migration systems. By releasing FreshBrew, we aim to facilitate rigorous, reproducible evaluation and catalyze progress in AI-driven codebase modernization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM AgentsXingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Lifan Yuan, Yizhe Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 436 citations
- AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program ImprovementYuntong Zhang, Haifeng Ruan, Zhiyu Fan, Abhik RoychoudhuryISSTA 2024 · 96 citations
- CodePlan: Repository-Level Coding using LLMs and PlanningRamakrishna Bairi, Atharv Sonwane, Aditya Kanade, Vageesh D. C. et al.FSE 2024 · 67 citations
Related papers
- Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with AgentsMingchen Zhuge, Changsheng Zhao, Dylan R. Ashley, Wenyi Wang et al.ICML 2025
- R2E: Turning any Github Repository into a Programming Agent EnvironmentNaman Jain, Manish Shetty, Tianjun Zhang, King Han et al.ICML 2024 · 50 citations
- FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature DevelopmentQixing Zhou, Jiacheng Zhang, Haiyang Wang, Rui Hao et al.ICLR 2026 · 30 citations
- CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding ChallengesKechi Zhang, Jia Li, Ge Li, Xianjie Shi et al.ACL 2024
- RefAgent: A Multi-agent LLM-based Framework for Automatic Software RefactoringKhouloud Oueslati, Maxime Lamothe, Foutse KhomhICSE 2026 · 1 citation
