PARIF: Pushing the Pareto Frontier of Instruction Following and Reasoning with Curriculum Reinforcement Learning
Rongchuan Mu, Zexin Wang, Qianyu Wang, Minghua Ma, Zekun Wang, Ming Liu, Bing Qin
Abstract
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex problem-solving but frequently overlook specific instruction constraints. Existing alignment methods struggle to balance general reasoning with instruction-following (IF), hindered by dependency on teacher models, reward hacking, and reasoning-answer inconsistencies. We propose PARIF, a two-stage curriculum learning framework based on Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to enhance both IF and general reasoning capabilities. The framework employs a correctness proxy across different stages to mitigate reward hacking. Stage I employs a dynamic weighting strategy simultaneously to optimize the model's reasoning paradigm regarding constraints. Stage II introduces Decoupled-GRPO, which builds upon the first stage to enhance the logical consistency between the reasoning process and the final answer, enabling the model to better leverage its optimized reasoning paradigm. To support the framework, we curate 26,000 high-quality instructions featuring diverse constraints. Extensive experiments demonstrate PARIF's effectiveness: our 7B model achieves a remarkable 21.25% relative average improvement to the original model across six representative IF tasks, while our 8B model outperforms leading models like DeepSeek-V3 on these IF tasks, effectively pushing the Pareto frontier of instruction following and reasoning for models of comparable scale. We open-source our code and models to facilitate future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 67b333b0-1b5a-4b8a-aa36-e30128359f93Builds on17
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the WildWenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie et al.ICLR 2024 · 504 citations
- ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning NeedsCheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 387 citations
- Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and DiversityRobert Kirk, Ishita Mediratta, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Jelena Luketina et al.ICLR 2024 · 332 citations
- Checklists Are Better Than Reward Models For Aligning Language ModelsVijay Viswanathan, Yanchao Sun, Xiang Kong, Meng Cao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 127 citations
Related papers
- Incentivizing Reasoning for Advanced Instruction-Following of Large Language ModelsYulei Qin, Gang Li, Zongyi Li, Zihan Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- RuCL: Stratified Rubric-Based Curriculum Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model ReasoningYukun Chen, Jiaming Li, Longze Chen, Ze Gong et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Curriculum Reinforcement Learning from Easy to Hard Tasks Improves LLM ReasoningShubham Parashar, Shurui Gui, Xiner Li, Hongyi Ling et al.ICLR 2026 · 112 citations
- VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction FollowingHao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Xiaozhi Wang, Bin Xu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 24 citations
- Light-IF: Endowing LLMs with Generalizable Reasoning via Preview and Self-Checking for Complex Instruction FollowingChenyang Wang, Liang Wen, Shousheng Jia, Xiangzheng Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
