Lune

EMNLP Findings2024

PclGPT: A Large Language Model for Patronizing and Condescending Language Detection

Hongbo Wang, Mingda Li, Junyu Lu, Hebin Xia, Liang Yang, Bo Xu, Ruizhu Liu, Hongfei Lin

Abstract

Disclaimer: Samples in this paper may be harmful and cause discomfort! Patronizing and condescending language (PCL) is a form of speech directed at vulnerable groups. As an essential branch of toxic language, this type of language exacerbates conflicts and confrontations among Internet communities and detrimentally impacts disadvantaged groups. Traditional pre-trained language models (PLMs) perform poorly in detecting PCL due to its implicit toxicity traits like hypocrisy and false sympathy. With the rise of large language models (LLMs), we can harness their rich emotional semantics to establish a paradigm for exploring implicit toxicity. In this paper, we introduce PclGPT 1 , a comprehensive LLM benchmark designed specifically for PCL. We collect, annotate, and integrate the Pcl-PT/SFT dataset, and then develop a bilingual PclGPT-EN/CN model group through a comprehensive pre-training and supervised fine-tuning staircase process to facilitate implicit toxic detection. Group detection results and fine-grained detection from PclGPT and other models reveal significant variations in the degree of bias in PCL towards different vulnerable groups, necessitating increased societal attention to protect them.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on9

  1. Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate SpeechMai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi et al.EMNLP 2021 · 159 citations
  2. COLD: A Benchmark for Chinese Offensive Language DetectionJiawen Deng, Jingyan Zhou, Hao Sun, Chujie Zheng et al.EMNLP 2022 · 82 citations
  3. On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot ReasoningOmar Shaikh, Hongxin Zhang, William Barr Held, Michael S. Bernstein et al.ACL 2023 · 61 citations
  4. Facilitating Fine-grained Detection of Chinese Toxic Language: Hierarchical Taxonomy, Resources, and BenchmarksJunyu Lu, Bo Xu, Xiaokun Zhang, Changrong Min et al.ACL 2023 · 25 citations
  5. Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilitiesSarthak Roy, Ashish Harshavardhan, Animesh Mukherjee, Punyajoy SahaEMNLP Findings 2023 · 23 citations

Related papers

  1. MDIT-Bench: Evaluating the Dual-Implicit Toxicity in Large Multimodal ModelsBohan Jin, Shuhan Qi, Kehai Chen, Xinyi Guo et al.ACL Findings 2025
  2. Pragmatic Inference Chain (PIC) Improving LLMs' Reasoning of Authentic Implicit Toxic LanguageXi Chen, Shuo WangEMNLP 2025 · 7 citations
  3. Probing Toxic Content in Large Pre-Trained Language ModelsNedjma Ousidhoum, Xinran Zhao, Tianqing Fang, Yangqiu Song et al.ACL 2021
  4. ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech DetectionThomas Hartvigsen, Saadia Gabriel, Hamid Palangi, Maarten Sap et al.ACL 2022
  5. µsicalnote Something Just Like TRuST µsicalnote *: Toxicity Recognition of Span and TargetBerk Atil, Namrata Sureddy, Rebecca J. PassonneauACL Findings 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines