TAMEing Long Contexts in Personalization: Towards Training-Free and State-Aware MLLM Personalized Assistant
Rongpei Hong, Jian Lang, Ting Zhong, Yong Wang, Fan Zhou
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) Personalization is a critical research problem that facilitates personalized dialogues with MLLMs targeting specific entities (known as personalized concepts). However, existing methods and benchmarks focus on the simple, context-agnostic visual identification and textual replacement of the personalized concept (e.g., "A yellow puppy" → "Your puppy Mochi"), overlooking the ability to support long-context conversations. An ideal personalized MLLM assistant is capable of engaging in long-context dialogues with humans and continually improving its experience quality by learning from past dialogue histories. To bridge this gap, we propose LCMP, the first Long-Context MLLM Personalization evaluation benchmark. LCMP assesses the capability of MLLMs in perceiving variations of personalized concepts and generating contextually appropriate personalized responses that reflect these variations. As a strong baseline for LCMP, we introduce a novel training-free and state-aware framework TAME. TAME endows MLLMs with double memories to manage the temporal and persistent variations of each personalized concept in a differentiated manner. In addition, TAME incorporates a new trainingfree Retrieve-then-Align Augmented Generation (RA 2 G) paradigm. RA 2 G introduces an alignment step to extract the contextually fitted information from the multi-memory retrieved knowledge to the current questions, enabling better interactions for complex real-world user queries. Experiments on LCMP demonstrate that TAME achieves the best performance, showcasing remarkable and evolving interaction experiences in long-context scenarios. CCS Concepts • Computing methodologies → Computer vision; • Humancentered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential LearnersAndrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin et al.AAAI 2024 · 484 citations
- CoRAL: Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models Improve Long-tail RecommendationJunda Wu, Cheng-Chun Chang, Tong Yu, Zhankui He et al.KDD 2024 · 32 citations
Related papers
- PersonaVLM: Long-Term Personalized Multimodal LLMsChang Nie, Chaoyou Fu, Yifan Zhang, Haihua Yang et al.CVPR 2026 · 11 citations
- LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet PersonalizationAlireza Salemi, Sheshera Mysore, Michael Bendersky, Hamed ZamaniACL 2024
- LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive MemoryDi Wu, Hongwei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yuwei Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
- ES-MemEval: Benchmarking Conversational Agents on Personalized Long-Term Emotional SupportTiantian Chen, Jiaqi Lu, Ying Shen, Lin ZhangWWW 2026 · 1 citation
- LaMP-QA: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Question AnsweringAlireza Salemi, Hamed ZamaniEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
